Objectives: To establish whether existing exercise programmes offered to people with sarcopenia or frailty adhere to the current evidence base. Methods: We conducted a national survey of practitioners delivering exercise programmes to older people with sarcopenia or frailty in the UK. The link to the online survey was distributed through email lists of professional societies, practice networks and social media. Questions covered target population and programme aims, type, duration and frequency of exercise, progress assessment and outcome measures. Results: One hundred and thirty-six responses were received. 94% of respondents reported prescribing or delivering exercise programmes to people with sarcopenia or frailty. Most programmes (81/135 [60%]) were primarily designed to prevent or reduce falls. Resistance training was the main focus in only 11/123 (9%), balance training in 61/123 (50%) and functional exercise in 28/123 (23%). Exercise was offered once a week or less by 81/124 (65%) of respondents. Outcome measures suitable for assessing the effect of resistance training programmes were reported by fewer than half of respondents (hand grip: 13/119 [11%]; chair stands: 55/119 [46%]). Conclusions: Current UK exercise programmes offered to older people with sarcopenia or frailty lack the specificity, frequency or duration of exercise likely to improve outcomes for this patient group.

Background Awareness of sarcopenia and frailty is growing and both are known to be potentially reversible with effective resistance training. We aimed to establish whether existing exercise programmes offered to people with sarcopenia or frailty adhere to the known evidence base. Methods We conducted a national on-line survey of practitioners delivering exercise programmes to older people with sarcopenia or frailty. The link to the online survey was distributed through the British Geriatrics Society, Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Special Interest Group for Older People (AGILE), the NHS England Future Collaboration Platform “Supporting People Living with Frailty” forum and social media. Questions covered target population and aims of the exercise programme, type, duration and frequency of exercise, progress assessment and outcome measures. Descriptive analyses were conducted using SPSS v24. Results 136 responses were received from respondents who worked for NHS Trusts, clinical commissioning groups, private practices, and third sector providers. 94% of respondents reported prescribing or delivering exercise programmes to people with sarcopenia or frailty. Most programmes (81/135 [60%]) were primarily designed to prevent or reduce falls. Resistance training was reported as the main focus of the programme in only 11/123 (9%); balance training was the main focus in 61/123 (50%) and functional exercise in 28/123 (23%). Exercise was offered once a week or less by 81/124 (65%) of respondents; the median number of sessions offered was 8.5 (IQR 6 to 12). Outcome measures suitable for assessing the effect of resistance training programmes were reported by fewer than half of respondents (hand grip: 13/119 [11%]; chair stands: 55/119 [46%], short physical performance battery: 4/119 [3%]). Conclusions Current exercise programmes offered to older people with sarcopenia or frailty lack the frequency, duration or specificity of exercise likely to improve outcomes for this group of patients.