Since the initial emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, a rapid spread of the disease occurred around the world, rising to become an international global health concern at pandemic level. In the face of this medical challenge threatening humans, the development of rapid and accurate methods for early screening and diagnosis of COVID-19 became crucial to containing the emerging public health threat, and prevent further spread within the population. Despite the large number of COVID-19 confirmed cases in China, some problematic cases with inconsistent laboratory testing results, were reported. Specifically, a high false-negative rate of 41% on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays was observed in China. Although serological testing has been applied worldwide as a complementary method to help identify SARS-CoV-2, several limitations on its use have been reported in China. Therefore, the use of both qRT-PCR and serological testing in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in China and elsewhere, presented considerable challenges, but when used in combination, can be valuable tools in the fight against COVID-19. In this review, we give an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of different molecular techniques for SARS-CoV-2 detection that are currently used in several labs, including qRT-PCR, gene sequencing, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), nucleic acid mass spectrometry (MS), and gene editing technique based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR/Cas13) system. Then we mainly review and analyze some causes of false-negative qRT-PCR results, and how to resolve some of the diagnostic dilemma.

Background:Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been proved effective for enhancing the clinical healing rate and reducing hospitalization cost in most countries of the world. It's a multi-model approach that designed to optimize perioperative pathway, attenuate the surgical stress response, and decrease postoperative complications.Objective:The economic benefit from the application of ERAS to colorectal surgery has been demonstrated in China. However, such economic benefit of ERAS programs for hepatectomy hasn’t been clarified yet. This study was carried out to explore the clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of ERAS in Chinese Han population after hepatectomy.Methods:ERAS program was implemented in our department for hepatectomy in December 2016. In total, 79 consecutive patients after hepatectomy were chosen as ERAS group (ERAS protocol) in coming half year while 121 consecutive patients after hepatectomy were chosen as Pre-ERAS group (traditional protocol) in past half year. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay (LOS), complication, readmission, and hospitalization cost of 2 groups were compared.Results:The LOS of ERAS group was 5.81 ± 1.79 days, significantly shorter than that of Pre-ERAS group (8.06 ± 3.40 d) (P = .000). The operation time was 168.03 ± 46.20 minutes for ERAS group and 175.41 ± 64.64 minutes for Pre-ERAS group respectively (P = .417). The intraoperative blood loss was 166.58 ± 194.13 mL (ERAS group) and 205.45 ± 279.63 mL (Pre-ERAS group) (P = .293). It should be noted that the hospitalization cost of ERAS group was 51556.18 ± 8926.05 Yuan (7835.05 ± 1355.45 US dollars), significantly less than that of Pre-ERAS group 60554.66 ± 15615.31 Yuan (9202.56 ± 2371.24 US dollars) (P = .000). The application of ERAS effectively saved 8998.48 Yuan (1367.51 US dollars) for each patient.Conclusions:ERAS implementation for hepatectomy surgery is safe and feasible for Chinese Han population. It eventually enhanced the clinical healing rate. The benefits from such programs include a reduction of the LOS, complication, and readmission rates. So each patient has access to better medical service. It effectively relieved the financial burden of patients. The benefits from such programs include a reduction of the hospitalization cost, especially in medication cost. So each patient can afford the diseases.

IntroductionAs participants of the national China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net program, we sought to describe the epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility patterns of yeast isolates obtained from patients with invasive fungal infection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.MethodsA total of 434 yeast isolates recovered from blood and other sterile body fluids were identified to species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization –time of flight mass spectrometry with or without supplementation by DNA sequencing. Antifungal susceptibilities were determined by Sensititre YeastOneTM YO10 methodology.ResultsCandida albicans was the most common causative species (33.9% of isolates) but significantly decreased in frequency from 37.2% to 27.7% from 2012 to 2014. C. tropicalis was the next most common pathogen (25.1%), followed by C. parapsilosis complex (17.3%), C. glabrata (9%), and C. pelliculosa (6.7%), with other species comprising 8% of isolates. Caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin exhibited potent in vitro activities against the majority of Candida isolates. Azoles demonstrated in vitro activities against C. albicans with a susceptibility rate of >95% and against C. parapsilosis complex, >95% isolates were susceptible. Among C. tropicalis and C. glabrata isolates, resistance rates to fluconazole and voriconazole were 11.9%, 9.1% and 7.7%, 28.2%, respectively. Of note, C. pelliculosa had a high incidence rate in newborns and high rates of resistance to fluconazole and voriconazole of 55.2% and 41.4%, respectively.ConclusionThe present study provided valuable local surveillance data on the epidemiology and antifungal susceptibilities of invasive yeast species, which is essential for guiding antifungal treatment protocol development.