Background: Dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) is considered to be a type of regenerative therapy and is widely used in various musculoskeletal disorders. Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of heel pain that affects the quality of life of many people. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DPT for plantar fasciitis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their respective inception dates to June 2021. Only randomized controlled trials comparing DPT and other interventions for plantar fasciitis were included in this review. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for comparison. The outcome measurements included visual analog score, numeric rating scale, Foot Function index, Revised Foot Function index, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score, and plantar fascia thickness. Post-treatment duration was classified as short-term (1–2 months), medium-term (3 months), or long-term (6 months). Results: Six studies with 388 adult patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis were included for the meta-analysis. In terms of pain scores improvement, DPT was superior to placebo or exercise in the short-term (SMD: −1.163, 95%CI: −2.17 to −0.156) and the medium-term (SMD: −1.394, 95%CI: −2.702 to −0.085). DPT was inferior to corticosteroid injection in the short-term (SMD: 0.781, 95%CI: 0.41 to 1.152). For functional improvement, DPT was superior to placebo or exercise in the short-term (SMD: −1.51, 95%CI: −2.96 to −0.059), but inferior to corticosteroid injection (SMD: 0.526, 95%CI: 0.161 to 0.89) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the short-term (SMD: 0.484, 95%CI: 0.145 to 0.822). Randomized controlled trials showed a better pain improvement in the long-term for patients treated with DPT compared to corticosteroid ( P = .002) and exercise control ( P < .05). No significant differences were found between patients treated with DPT and patients treated with platelet-rich plasma. Conclusion: Dextrose prolotherapy was a safe and effective treatment option for plantar fasciitis that may have long-term benefits for patients. The effects were comparable to extracorporeal shock wave therapy or platelet-rich plasma injection. Further studies with standardized protocols and long-term follow-up are needed to address potential biases.

Rationale:Esophageal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare type of esophageal tumor which are usually positive for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56 in tumor immunohistochemical staining. The most common symptoms of esophageal NETs are gastrointestinal symptoms such as dysphagia and/or abdominal discomfort. While esophageal NETs have the potential for distant metastasis, there have only been a few reports of brain metastasis originating from esophageal NET.Patient concerns:We report the case of a 60-year-old Taiwanese female who initially presented with a 1 month history of painless forehead and bilateral neck masses. She did not complain of any other symptoms, which complicated the diagnosis.Diagnoses:Chest and abdominal computed tomography were arranged for a thorough evaluation, and a paraesophageal lesion as well as multiple metastases in the liver, bilateral adrenal glands, and bone were found. Panendoscopy and pathology confirmed the diagnosis of an esophageal NET.Interventions:Best supportive care.Outcomes:The clinical course of this case deteriorated drastically, and she died of tumor progression 10 days after the diagnosis had been made.Lessons:To the best of our knowledge, this is the first article in the literature to report a case of esophageal NET whose initial presentation was painless forehead and bilateral neck masses. Clinicians should be aware of the early signs and symptoms of esophageal NET to allow for a prompt diagnosis.