Abstract. Antarctic ice velocity maps describe the ice flow
dynamics of the ice sheet and are one of the primary components used to
estimate the Antarctic mass balance and contribution to global sea level
changes. In comparison to velocity maps derived from recent satellite images
of monthly to weekly time spans, historical maps, from before the 1990s,
generally cover longer time spans, e.g., over 10 years, due to the scarce
spatial and temporal coverage of earlier satellite image data. We found
velocity overestimations (OEs) in such long-span maps that can be mainly
attributed to velocity gradients and time span of the images used. In
general, they are less significant in slow-flowing grounded regions with low
spatial accelerations. Instead, they take effect in places of high ice
dynamics, for example, near grounding lines and often in ice shelf fronts.
Velocities in these areas are important for estimating ice sheet mass
balance and analyzing ice shelf instability. We propose an innovative
Lagrangian velocity-based method for OE correction without the use of field
observations or additional image data. The method is validated by using a
set of ground truth velocity maps for the Totten Glacier and Pine Island
Glacier which are produced from high-quality Landsat 8 images from 2013 to
2020. Subsequently, the validated method is applied to a historical velocity
map of the David Glacier region from images from 1972–1989 acquired during
Landsat 1, 4, and 5 satellite missions. It is demonstrated that velocity overestimations of up to 39 m a−1 for David Glacier and 195 m a−1 for Pine Island Glacier can be effectively corrected. Furthermore, temporal
acceleration information, e.g., on basal melting and calving activities, is
preserved in the corrected velocity maps and can be used for long-term ice
flow dynamics analysis. Our experiment results in the Pine Island Glacier (PIG) show that OEs of a
15-year span can reach up to 1300 m a−1 along the grounding line and
cause an overestimated grounding line (GL) flux of 11.5 Gt a−1 if not corrected. The
magnitudes of the OEs contained in both velocity and mass balance estimates
are significant. When used alongside recent velocity maps of 1990s–2010s,
they may lead to underestimated long-term changes for assessment and
forecast modeling of the global climate change impact on the Antarctic ice
sheet. Therefore, the OEs in the long-span historical maps must be seriously
examined and corrected. We recommend that overestimations of more than the
velocity mapping uncertainty (1σ) be corrected. This velocity
overestimation correction method can be applied to the production of
regional and ice-sheet-wide historical velocity maps from long-term
satellite images.
Abstract. Recent research indicates that the estimated elevation changes and associated mass balance in East Antarctica are of some degree of uncertainty; a light accumulation has occurred in its vast inland regions, while mass loss in Wilkes Land appears significant. It is necessary to study the mass change trend in the context of a long period of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS). The input-output method based on surface ice flow velocity and ice thickness is one of the most important ways to estimate the mass balance, which can provide longer-term knowledge of mass balance because of the availability of the early satellites in 1960s. In this study, we briefly describe the method of extracting ice velocity based on the historical optical images from 1960s to 1980s. Based on the draft ice velocity map of the EAIS using this method, we conduct a series of validation experiments, including comparisons with in-situ measurement, existing historical maps and rock outcrop dataset. Finally, we use the input-output method to estimate mass balance in some regions of EAIS using the generated velocity map.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.