ObjectivesIn non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the immune system and possibly its composition affect survival. In this in silico study, the immune infiltrate composition in NSCLC patients was evaluated.MethodsGene expression data of tumors from early NSCLC patients were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). With CIBERSORT, 22 immune cell fractions were estimated.ResultsThe immune infiltrate of 1430 pretreatment NSCLC patients contained mostly plasma cells, macrophages and CD8 T cells. Higher fractions of resting mast and CD4 T‐helper cells were associated with longer overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.95, P < 0.01; HR = 0.98, = 0.04, respectively) and higher fractions of M2 macrophages and active dendritic cells with shorter survival (HR = 1.02, P = 0.03; HR = 1.03, P = 0.05, respectively). Adenocarcinoma patients with survival data (n = 587) showed higher fractions of resting mast and resting CD4 T cells, and lower M0 macrophages than squamous cell carcinoma (n = 254), which were associated with OS (HR = 0.95, P = 0.04; HR = 0.97, P = 0.01; HR = 1.03, P = 0.01, respectively). Fractions of memory B cells, naïve CD4 T cells and neutrophils had different associations with survival depending on the subtype. Smokers had had higher fractions of regulatory T cell, follicular helper T cell, neutrophil and M2 macrophage, which were associated with shorter survival (HR = 1.3, P < 0.01; HR = 1.13, P = 0.02; HR = 1.09, P = 0.03; HR = 1.04, P = 0.02, respectively).ConclusionPretreatment differences in immune cell composition in NSCLC are associated with survival and depend on smoking status and histological subtype. Smokers' immune composition is associated with lower survival.
The various modalities have similar sensitivity, but F-FDG-PET andTc-HMPAO-labeled WBC scintigraphy offer the highest specificity. Larger prospective studies with a direct comparison among the different imaging techniques are required.
Background Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors show long lasting responses, but it is hard to predict which patients will profit from this treatment with the currently used marker, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). We hypothesized that circulating tumor cells (CTC) or tumor derived extracellular vesicles (tdEV) are markers of treatment efficacy. Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC treated with checkpoint inhibitors were included. Blood was drawn at baseline (T0) and at 4 weeks of treatment (T1) for analysis of CTC and tdEV using CellSearch®. Tumor response was classified as partial or complete response based on the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECISTv1.1) measured 4–6 weeks after start of treatment. Durable response was defined as stable disease, partial or complete response without disease progression at 6 months. Analyses were adjusted for covariables including PD-L1 expression. Results We included 104 patients (30 with a tumor response, 74 non-responders, 2 responses not evaluable due to early death); 63 patients provided T1 samples. All patients were treated with PD-L1 inhibitors. The majority of patients received second (85%) or third line (treatment with nivolumab monotherapy (89%). CTC were present in 33/104 patients at T0 (32%) and 17/63 at T1 (27%), 9/63 patients had CTC (14%) at both time points. The presence of CTC, both at T0 (OR = 0.28, p = 0.02,) and T1 (OR = 0.07, p < 0.01), was an independent predictive factor for a lack of durable response and was associated with worse progression free and overall survival. More tdEV were associated with shorter survival but not with response rate. Conclusion CTC occur in one third of advanced NSCLC patients and their presence is a predictive factor for a worse durable response rate to checkpoint inhibitors. tdEV are associated with shorter survival but not with response. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0649-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.