Despite improved treatment strategies for multiple myeloma (MM), patient outcomes in low- and middle-income countries remain poor, unlike high-income countries. Scarcity of specialized human resources and diagnostic, treatment, and survivorship infrastructure are some of the barriers that patients with MM, clinicians, and policymakers have to overcome in the former setting. To improve outcomes of patients with MM in Western Kenya, the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) MM Program was set up in 2012. In this article, the program's activities, challenges, and future plans are described distilling important lessons that can be replicated in similar settings. Through the program, training on diagnosis and treatment of MM was offered to healthcare professionals from 35 peripheral health facilities across Western Kenya in 2018 and 2019. Access to antimyeloma drugs including novel agents was secured, and pharmacovigilance systems were developed. Finally, patients were supported to obtain health insurance in addition to receiving peer support through participation in support group meetings. This article provides an implementation blueprint for similar initiatives aimed at increasing access to care for patients with MM in underserved areas.

The rising burden of multiple myeloma in Kenya has not been met by a commensurate effort for control. Patients and practitioners struggle with unavailability and unaffordability of diagnostics, drugs and stem cell transplant leading to presentation at advanced stages and under-treatment with increased morbidities and mortality. A concerted effort among stakeholders is urgently needed to develop strategies for myeloma control. The scarcity of providers also carries grave consequences for Kenyan patients. The Academic Model Providing Access To Healthcare (AMPATH) multiple myeloma program organized the Inaugural Virtual Multiple Myeloma Congress to achieve both interactive specialist instruction and stakeholder engagement. Expert presenters and panellists from diverse disciplines were invited to offer in-depth presentations on myeloma care and case studies from panellists´ practice were used to contextualize learning points and form a basis for generating debate on the challenges facing providers and opportunities for care improvement. An audience of health professionals offering care to myeloma patients was invited. The underlying principle of recommendations developed during the congress was collaboration among in-country and international practitioners, researchers and policy experts from private and public sector. This partnership of stakeholders bears the potential of pooling scarce resources and for collective advocacy towards better patient care

PURPOSE Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in Kenya have not been adequately characterized. The objectives of this study were to describe the clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings at diagnosis, to describe the treatment offered, and to determine the survival outcomes of patients with MM over an 11-year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review was carried out for all patients who were diagnosed and treated for MM at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital from 2009 to 2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Factors affecting survival were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 221 patient charts were analyzed of which 124 belonged to male patients (56.1%). The median age at diagnosis was 61 years. Bone pain was the most common presenting complaint observed in 69.6% of 194 patients assessed. Out of 102 patients who received imaging studies, 60 (58.8%) had lytic lesions, 30 (29.4%) had fractures, whereas 30 (29.4%) had spinal cord compression. Anemia, renal failure, and hypercalcemia were observed in 87/187 (46.5%), 22/161 (13.7%), and 23/42 (54.8%) patients, respectively. Thalidomide and dexamethasone (65.2%); bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (14.6%); and melphalan and prednisolone (11.9%) were the most prescribed initial chemotherapy regimens among 219 patients analyzed. Overall survival at 1 and 5 years was 70% and 21%, respectively; median overall survival was 29.0 months. In multivariate analysis, male sex (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9), baseline anemia (HR 1.8), and baseline renal failure (HR 3.2) were associated with significantly shorter survival. CONCLUSION Survival outcomes were poor despite increased use of multiagent-based chemotherapy regimens. Greater access to available diagnostics and treatments is required to achieve rational treatment and increased survival.

e24036 Background: Multiple myeloma is a chronic progressive disease that calls for extended survivorship support post-diagnosis. Pre- COVID-19, the AMPATH Multiple Myeloma Program had created support groups for myeloma survivors and their caregivers that regularly met for health education, emotional support, and social opportunities. With the enforcement COVID-19 prevention and control protocols physical support group meetings became impossible. The program shifted to the online platform to sustain peer to peer support for myeloma patients and caregivers. We aim to describe challenges faced with online patient support group meetings as this has not been well documented in a resource-constrained setting. Methods: Myeloma patients and caregivers at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital were contacted and a meeting date and time agreed. Participants were briefed on how to download and operate the zoom application in preparation for online meetings. A meeting link was shared with the expected attendees and a reminder sent two days before a meeting. Support group meetings were held for different groups among them myeloma survivors and caregivers. The meeting sessions were led by healthcare professionals – hematology consultants, social workers, nutritionist and psychosocial counsellors. Peer-to-peer sessions were also held. Results: Six online meeting sessions were held between June 2020 and December 2020. A total of 199 participants were expected to join the six different meetings but a low meeting turn-out of 25.6% was experienced. Participants were later contacted to unravel the reasons for a low turn-out. A total of 129 participants were contacted of which 88 responded. Out of the 88 respondents, 29% reported a tight work schedule, 25% short time meeting alerts, 20% did not have access to smartphones, and 8% had poor internet connectivity and another 8% reported no internet data bundles to connect to the internet. Conclusions: Low attendance of online meetings was observed. Participants cited scheduling and internet access as major obstacles to attending online support group meetings. Improved access to the internet through smartphones, reliable internet connection, and affordable data are needed in underserved communities to fully unlock the benefits of virtual platforms namely cost savings and effective information sharing.