This study was designed to determine whether exposure to a complex environment after traumatic brain injury (TBI) would promote the recovery of cognitive function. Rats were injured at a moderate level of fluid percussion injury (2.1 atm) or were prepared for injury but were not injured (sham injury). Immediately after the injury or sham injury, the injured/complex (n = 8) and the sham/complex (n = 7) groups were placed into a complex environment. The complex environment was a 89 x 89-cm enclosure with different types of bedding and objects that provided motor, olfactory, tactile, and visual stimulation. The injured/standard (n = 8) and the sham/standard (n = 8) groups were returned to the animal vivarium where they were housed individually in standard wire mesh cages (24 x 20 x 18 cm). On days 11-15 (postinjury), performance in the Morris water maze was assessed. Analysis of the latency to reach the goal platform indicated that injured animals recuperating in the complex environment performed significantly better than injured animals recovering in the standard environment (p < 0.01). In fact, injured animals in the complex environment performed as well as both sham-injured groups. The improved performance of injured rats recovering in the enriched environment occurred in the absence of environmentally induced alterations in brain weight. These results indicate that exposure to environmental complexity enhances recovery of cognitive function after TBI.

This study was designed to examine working memory following fluid-percussion traumatic brain injury (TBI) using the Morris water maze (MWM). Rats were injured (n = 9) at a moderate level of central fluid percussion injury (2.1 atm) or were prepared for injury but did not receive a fluid pulse (sham injury) (n = 10). On days 11-15 postinjury, working memory was assessed using the MWM. Each animal received 8 pairs of trials per day. For each pair of trials, animals were randomly assigned to one of four possible starting points and one of four possible escape platform positions. On the first trial of each pair, rats were placed in the maze facing the wall and were given 120 sec to locate the hidden escape platform. After remaining on the goal platform for 10 sec, they were placed back into the maze for the second trial of the pair. The platform position and the start position remained unchanged on this trial. After the second trial, the animal was given a 4 min intertrial rest. Between pairs of trials, both the start position and the goal location were changed. Analyses of the latency to reach the goal platform indicated that sham-injured animals performed significantly better on the second trial than on the first trial of each pair. However, injured animals did not significantly differ between first and second trial goal latencies on any day. These results indicate that injured animals have a profound and enduring deficit in spatial working memory function on days 11-15 after TBI.

We describe a novel strategy to evaluate circuit function after brain injury that takes advantage of experience-dependent immediate early gene (IEG) expression. When normal rats undergo training or are exposed to a novel environment, there is a strong induction of IEG expression in forebrain regions, including the hippocampus. This gene induction identifies the neurons that are engaged during the experience. Here, we demonstrate that experience-dependent IEG induction is diminished after brain injury in young adult rats (120-200 gm), specifically after unilateral lesions of the entorhinal cortex (EC), and then recovers with a time course consistent with reinnervation. In situ hybridization techniques were used to assess the expression of the activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein Arc at various times after the lesion (4, 8, 12, 16, or 30 d). One group of rats was allowed to explore a complex novel environment for 1 hr; control operated animals remained in their home cage. In unoperated animals, exposure to the novel environment induced Arc mRNA levels in most pyramidal neurons in CA1, in many pyramidal neurons in CA3, and in a small number of dentate granule cells. This characteristic pattern of induction was absent at early time points after unilateral EC lesions (4 and 8 d) but recovered progressively at later time points. The recovery of Arc expression occurred with approximately the same time course as the reinnervation of the dentate gyrus as a result of postlesion sprouting. These results document a novel approach for quantitatively assessing activity-regulated gene expression in polysynaptic circuits after trauma.

Near-completion of the Human Genome Project has stimulated scientists to begin looking for the next step in unraveling normal and abnormal functions within biological systems. Consequently, there is new focus on the role of proteins in these processes. Proteomics is a burgeoning field that may provide a valuable approach to evaluate the post-traumatic central nervous system (CNS). Although we cannot provide a comprehensive assessment of all methods for protein analysis, this report summarizes some of the newer proteomic technologies that have propelled this field into the limelight and that are available to most researchers in neurotrauma. Three technical approaches (two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, direct analysis by mass spectrometry, including two-dimensional chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry and isotope coded affinity tags, and antibody technologies) are reviewed, and their advantages and disadvantages presented. A discussion of proteomic technology in the context of brain and spinal cord trauma follows, addressing current and future challenges. Proteomics will likely be very useful for developing diagnostic predictors after CNS injury and for mapping changes in proteins after injury in order to identify new therapeutic targets. Neurotrauma results in complex alterations to the biological systems within the nervous system, and these changes evolve over time. Exploration of the "new nervous system" that follows injury will require methods that can both fully assess and simplify this complexity.

Previous studies have shown that location and direction of injury may affect outcome in experimental models of traumatic brain injury. Significant variability in outcome data has also been noted in studies using the lateral fluid percussion brain injury model (FPI) in rats. In recent studies from our laboratory, we observed considerable variability in localization and severity of tissue damage as a function of small changes in craniotomy position. To further address this issue, we examined the relationship between craniotomy position and brain lesion size/location in rats subjected to moderate FPI (2.28 +/- 0.18 atmospheres). With placement of a 5-mm craniotomy adjacent to the sagittal suture, there was both ipsilateral and contralateral damage as detected at 3 weeks posttrauma using T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI lesions were generally restricted to the hippocampus and subcortical layers. Shifting of the craniotomy site laterally was associated with increased ipsilateral tissue damage and a greater cortical component that correlated with distance from the sagittal suture. In contrast, the contralateral MRI lesion did not change significantly in size or location unless the center of the craniotomy was placed more than 3.5 mm from the sagittal suture, under which condition contralateral damage could no longer be detected. Ipsilateral tissue damage as determined from the MRI scans was linearly correlated to motor outcome but not with cognitive outcome as assessed by the Morris Water Maze. We conclude that craniotomy position is critical in determining extent and location of tissue injury produced during the lateral FPI model in rats. Addressing such potential variability is essential for studies that address either injury mechanisms or therapeutic treatments.