Productive fisheries are strongly linked to the ecological state of the essential habitats. In this study, we developed a methodology to assess the most important reproduction habitats of fish by using larval survey data and Bayesian species distribution models that predict the spatial distribution and abundance of fish larvae. Our case study with four commercially and ecologically important fish species in the coastal zone of the northern Baltic Sea demonstrated that the production of fish stocks can be concentrated to an extremely limited area compared with the entire suitable production area. The area suitable for larval production varied from 3.7% to 99.8% among species, but the smallest area responsible for 80% of the cumulative larval production was two to five times more limited, varying from 1.4% to 52.9% among species. Hence, instead of the traditional approach of modeling only habitat suitability for fish production, marine spatial planning and management should take into account the areal production potential. Moreover, the developed methodology enables linking of the total production potential across the whole distribution area to fisheries stock assessment and management.
Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.