BackgroundRussian society has faced dramatic changes in terms of social stratification since the collapse of the Soviet Union. During this time, extensive reforms have taken place in the organisation of health services, including the development of the private sector. Previous studies in Russia have shown a wide gap in mortality between socioeconomic groups. There are just a few studies on health service utilisation in post-Soviet Russia and data on inequality of health service use are limited. The aim of the present study was to analyse health (self-rated health and self-reported chronic diseases) and health care utilisation patterns by socioeconomic status (SES) among reproductive age women in St. Petersburg.MethodsThe questionnaire survey was conducted in 2004 (n = 1147), with a response rate of 67%. Education and income were used as dimensions of SES. The association between SES and health and use of health services was assessed by logistic regression, adjusting for age.ResultsAs expected low SES was associated with poor self-rated health (education: OR = 1.48; personal income: OR = 1.42: family income: OR = 2.31). University education was associated with use of a wider range of outpatient medical services and increased use of the following examinations: Pap smear (age-adjusted OR = 2.06), gynaecological examinations (age-adjusted OR = 1.62) and mammography among older (more than 40 years) women (age-adjusted OR = 1.98). Personal income had similar correlations, but family income was related only to the use of mammography among older women.ConclusionsOur study suggests a considerable inequality in health and utilisation of preventive health service among reproductive age women. Therefore, further studies are needed to identify barriers to health promotion resources.

The use of reliable contraception in Russia remains lower and rates of induced abortion higher than in Western Europe, even though reliable contraception has been accessible for nearly two decades now. Due to the organisation of women's health services in Russian cities, gynaecologists can have a major influence on women's contraceptive choices, but little is known about their attitudes and practices in terms of contraception promotion. This study draws on qualitative observation and interview data of gynaecologists in public-sector women's clinics in St. Petersburg, Russia's second largest city in order to investigate their perceptions of various birth control methods and contraception counselling. Also in focus are clinical counselling practices. The results reveal that gynaecologists in St. Petersburg had up-to-date knowledge of the latest contraception methods and that they were willing to promote their use. They took an active role in counselling, although the coverage was not full. The depth of counselling varied considerably and counselling practices were mainly paternalistic. Yet, in about a third of the observed cases, patient preferences were incorporated into clinical decision-making. The gynaecologists perceived reliable contraception essentially as a means of fostering future fertility and avoiding harmful health consequences of induced abortions. Using reliable contraception was equated with being a responsible and morally respectable woman. The results suggest that links between health, risk and morality are vividly present in contraception counselling in St. Petersburg, and that reliable contraception has become a powerful source of new moral demands for individual women to foster their reproductive function.

The new financing mechanisms introduced into the Russian health care system since the beginning of the 1990s have not resolved its severe financial problems. This article examines the consequences for outpatient services and the daily work of individual doctors in St. Petersburg, using women's reproductive health services as a case example. Interview and observational data reveal a constant opposition between formal rules and informal practices at both the administrative and polyclinic levels. Polyclinics for women's reproductive health services have developed various strategies as a response to insufficient financing, but many of these strategies are questionable within the current mandatory health insurance system. Ordinary doctors perceive the development as mainly negative. The results raise the question of increasing arbitrariness, from patients' perspective, in the health services provided. The study illustrates how in a post-socialist context, the past constantly permeates the present in the form of novel adaptations to the new social context.

Reproductive health services within Russia and Central Eastern European (CEE) postsocialistcountries received particular attention both internationally and nationallyin the early 1990s. There was a shared concern about access to proper services in thefield of family planning and antenatal care and about the knowledge, attitudes, andpractices of medical professionals. Yet comprehensive reviews of research literature onthe topic are difficult to find in English. This review was written to construct a generalview of the situation in Russia and CEE countries for the purposes of a research projecton reproductive health services in St. Petersburg. The review consists of empiricalreports and systematic reviews published in English. It is structured in two parts:(1) providers knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding family planning and (2)patient involvement in clinical decision-making and provider-patient relationships inreproductive health services.

Russia provides an interesting case for comparative research of maternity care due to the rapid social change and steep fertility decline since the collapse of the Soviet Union. I analyze out-patient maternity care in public sector women's clinics in St. Petersburg on the basis of qualitative observation and interview data. Gynecologists' role in monitoring pregnancy is central, resulting in an emphasis on medical expertise and risk management. Ideally, gynecologists see themselves as medical experts and maternal caretakers, but the latter role seldom materializes in practice. Gynecologists' ideas of pregnancy planning demonstrate a wish for further medicalization of maternity care.