International audienceAn important problem in knowledge-based systems is inconsistency handling. This problem has recently been attracting a lot of attention in AI community. In this paper, we tackle the problem of evaluating the amount of conflicts in knowledge bases, and provide a new fine grained inconsistency measure, denoted |MCC, based on maximal consistent sets (MCSes). The main idea consists in quantifying the inconsistency of a knowledge base by considering that all its consistent pieces of information are possible. Furthermore, we provide an epistemic interpretation of our inconsistency measure using the multimodal logic S5. Then, we show that |MCC satisfies several state-of-the-art postulates. Moreover, we provide an encoding in integer linear programming for computing our inconsistency measure, which is defined from the set of MCSes. We also propose a Partial Max-SAT encoding, which allows us to avoid the computation of the MCSes. Finally, we provide a comparison between |MCC and two related existing inconsistency measure
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.