There have been a number of agents that have been tried for treatment of gastroparesis over the past 3 decades, with varying levels of success. Guidelines exist for the management of gastroparesis in adults; however, even though the cause of gastroparesis in children is similar to that in adults, no guidelines exist for treating pediatric gastroparesis as studies on the topic are limited. With what little information we have on pediatric gastroparesis, medications used in children's studies do not seem to demonstrate the same results as in adult patients with gastroparesis; thus, future studies of whether certain medications are effective for treating pediatric gastroparesis and at what dose still need to be conducted. Pharmacological treatment options for pediatric gastroparesis do not show a clear correlation of resolving or even maintaining gastroparesis-associated symptoms or disease state. This article reviews the available studies of drugs that have shown some efficacy, with an emphasis on pediatric studies.

IntroductionMacrophages play an important role in HIV, where they are a cellular reservoir. Macrophages are polarized into two phenotypes: pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages, which may have altered expression of drug efflux transporters, including BCRP and MRP1. These differences may result in subtherapeutic concentrations of antiretrovirals inside of macrophages and viral replication.MethodsU937 and U1 cells were polarized to the M1 or M2 phenotype via IFN-γ and LPS, or IL-4, IL-13, and LPS. Transporter expression was assessed via PCR and Western blotting, and transporter function was assessed via fluorescent dye assays. Transporter function was blocked with the inhibitors MK571 or KO143. Protein expression was confirmed in monocyte-derived macrophages. p24 production was assessed in U1 cells via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.ResultsmRNA and protein analysis demonstrated higher expression of MRP1 in M1 macrophages, while BCRP expression was downregulated in M1 macrophages. Treatment with inhibitors of transporter function decreased the difference in intracellular fluorescence between polarized macrophages. Differences in protein expression, which were observed with U937 cells, were confirmed in monocyte-derived macrophages. M1, but not M2 cells treated with MK571, showed decreased p24 production, consistent with reported MRP1 transporter expression.ConclusionsThese results support our hypothesis that there is differential expression of MRP1 and BCRP on M1 and M2 polarized macrophages and suggests that these differences may result in altered intracellular concentrations of antiretrovirals in macrophages and alter viral production in these cells. Targeting these differences may be a strategy to decrease viral replication in HIV-infected individuals.

No abstract

We evaluated pain status change and associations with subsequent opioid/marijuana use among 1,208 adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pain status and opioid/marijuana were self-reported at baseline and follow-up evaluation (mean interval: 4.2 years). Over time, 18.7% of survivors endorsed persistent/increasing significant pain; 4.8% and 9.0% reported having used opioids and marijuana at follow-up. Persistent/increased (vs. none/decreased) pain, persistent/increased (vs. none/decreased) anxiety, and lack of health insurance increased odds of subsequent opioid use by 7.69-fold (95% CI = 3.71 to 15.95), 2.55-fold (95% CI = 1.04 to 6.24), and 2.50-fold (95% CI = 1.07 to 5.82), respectively. Persistent/increased (vs. none/decreased) depression increased odds of subsequent marijuana use by 2.64-fold (95% CI = 1.10 to 6.33).