One of 13 healthy dogs used in a pharmacokinetic study of imidocarb dipropionate died due to difficulty in breathing, tachycardia, weakness and profuse diarrhoea. Autopsy findings showed marked pulmonary congestion and oedema. Kidneys were grossly enlarged and markedly congested with extensive haemorrhage in the cortex and medulla. Marked tubulonephrosis was also exhibited microscopically. Liver and spleen were moderately enlarged and congested. The adverse effects of imidocarb may be due to excessive acetylcholine action.
Background The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe the demographics, injury patterns, and treatment characteristics of patients who sustained a gunshot injury (GSI) of the hand; and (2) examine the utilization of healthcare resources in patients with a GSI of the hand. Methods We retrospectively identified 148 adult patients who were treated for a GSI of the hand between January 2000 to December 2017 using multiple International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Edition (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes. We used bivariate and multivariable analysis to identify which factors are associated with unplanned reoperation, length of hospitalization, and number of operations. Results Multivariable logistic regression showed that fracture severity was associated with unplanned reoperation. Multivariable linear regression showed that fracture severity is associated with a higher number of hand operations after a GSI of the hand, and that a retained bullet (fragment) and patients having gunshot injuries in other regions than the hand had a longer length of hospitalization. Seventy (47%) patients had sensory or motor symptoms in the hand after their GSI, of which 22 (15%) patients had a transection of the nerve. Conclusions Sensory and motor nerve deficits are common after a GSI of the hand. However, only 31% of patients with symptoms had a transection of the nerve. A retained bullet (fragment), having more severe hand fractures, and GSI in other regions than the hand are associated with a higher number of operation and a longer period of hospitalization.
Objective The aims of this study are to describe and identify the factors that influence patient reported outcomes following surgery of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. The secondary objective is to report the rate of reintervention following surgery of de Quervain's tenosynovitis.
Patients and Methods Outcomes using the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), the Patients Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS PI), and a custom de Quervain's questionnaire were obtained. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with patient-reported outcomes.
Results Seventy-six patients who underwent de Quervain's release participated. The average age was 52.8 years (95% confidence interval: 49.6–56.1) and median follow-up age was 7.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.3–12.0). Outcomes were: NRS of pain was 0 (IQR: 0.0–3.0), the median QuickDASH was 6.82 (IQR: 0.00–28.41), the median PRWE score was 4.0 (IQR: 0.00–18.50), and the median PROMIS PI score was 43.90 (IQR: 38.70–53.90). Eighteen (23.7%) of the patients reported pain with thumb activities, four of whom had a reintervention. Additionally, 21 (26.9%) patients reported decreased strength in the thumb compared to the contralateral side, of which two underwent a reintervention. In total, eight patients underwent reintervention of which seven had a second surgery and one had a cortisone injection.
Conclusion Roughly 1 in 20 patients following de Quervain's release undergoes reintervention. Patients with high PROMIS PI scores report poor surgical outcomes more frequently. Patients with high PROMIS PI scores report higher NRS pain scores (p < 0.05), higher QuickDASH scores (p < 0.05), and higher PRWE scores (p < 0.05). In practice, careful consideration of PROMIS PI scores and psychosocial factors are recommended before considering reintervention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.