No abstract

No abstract

Hyperproperties relate multiple computation traces to each other. Model checkers for hyperproperties thus return, in case a system model violates the specification, a set of traces as a counterexample. Fixing the erroneous relations between traces in the system that led to the counterexample is a difficult manual effort that highly benefits from additional explanations. In this paper, we present an explanation method for counterexamples to hyperproperties described in the specification logic HyperLTL. We extend Halpern and Pearl's definition of actual causality to sets of traces witnessing the violation of a HyperLTL formula, which allows us to identify the events that caused the violation. We report on the implementation of our method and show that it significantly improves on previous approaches for analyzing counterexamples returned by HyperLTL model checkers.

We study the ability of language models to translate natural language into formal specifications with complex semantics. In particular, we fine-tune off-the-shelf language models on three datasets consisting of structured English sentences and their corresponding formal representation: 1) First-order logic (FOL), commonly used in software verification and theorem proving; 2) linear-time temporal logic (LTL), which forms the basis for industrial hardware specification languages; and 3) regular expressions (regex), frequently used in programming and search. Our experiments show that, in these diverse domains, the language models achieve competitive performance to the respective state-of-the-art with the benefits of being easy to access, cheap to fine-tune, and without a particular need for domainspecific reasoning. Additionally, we show that the language models have a unique selling point: they benefit from their generalization capabilities from pre-trained knowledge on natural language, e.g., to generalize to unseen variable names.

Compositional synthesis relies on the discovery of assumptions, i.e., restrictions on the behavior of the remainder of the system that allow a component to realize its specification. In order to avoid losing valid solutions, these assumptions should be necessary conditions for realizability. However, because there are typically many different behaviors that realize the same specification, necessary behavioral restrictions often do not exist. In this paper, we introduce a new class of assumptions for compositional synthesis, which we call information flow assumptions. Such assumptions capture an essential aspect of distributed computing, because components often need to act upon information that is available only in other components. The presence of a certain flow of information is therefore often a necessary requirement, while the actual behavior that establishes the information flow is unconstrained. In contrast to behavioral assumptions, which are properties of individual computation traces, information flow assumptions are hyperproperties, i.e., properties of sets of traces. We present a method for the automatic derivation of information-flow assumptions from a temporal logic specification of the system. We then provide a technique for the automatic synthesis of component implementations based on information flow assumptions. This provides a new compositional approach to the synthesis of distributed systems. We report on encouraging first experiments with the approach, carried out with the BoSyHyper synthesis tool.