COVID‐19 outbreaks appear to be related to exacerbation of psychological problems such as depression and anxiety in high‐risk population such as pregnant women and the postpartum period due to stress and life‐threatening illnesses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD) during COVID‐19. This study protocol is registered in PROSPERO with CRD42021278425 code. Data sources including Google Scholar, ISC, Magiran, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science and reference list of included articles were used to identify related studies. Observational studies that reported the prevalence of PPD in both Persian and English during COVID‐19 between January 20, 2020 and August 31, 2021 were included. Data were collected and analyzed with a random effects model for meta‐analysis. In this study, 671 initial articles were identified and after removing duplicates, 454 studies were screened and finally 24 studies entered the meta‐analysis stage. According to this study results PPD based on Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) ≥9, EPDS ≥10, EPDS ≥11, EPDS ≥12, EPDS ≥13, Postpartum Depression Screening Scale‐Short Form (PDSS‐SF) ≥17 and total prevalence was reported 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.07–17, I2 = 97%), 27% (95% CI = 15–39, I2 = 99%), 44% (95% CI = 40–49, I2 = 0.0%), 27% (95% CI = 0.06–49, I2 = 97.4%), 28% (95% CI = 18–39, I2 = 98.5%), 37% (95% CI = 32–42), 28% (95% CI = 23–33, I2 = 98.5%). The findings of this study showed that the prevalence of PPD in women is relatively high during COVID‐19. Therefore, considering the psychological consequences of the COVID‐19 pandemic and the importance of pregnancy and the postpartum period in terms of the emergence of mental disorders, especially depression, it seems necessary to perform interventions and physical and psychological support.

Background: Examining various problems after disasters is important for the affected people. Managing humanitarian aid and donations among the affected people is considered as one of the most important problems after disasters. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the challenges and barriers of humanitarian aid management in 2017 Kermanshah Earthquake. Methods: This study was conducted from November 2017 to January 2018, with qualitative case study design. The population included 21 people including 6 humanitarian aid manager, 6 volunteers, 4 aid workers, and 5 affected people. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews and purposeful sampling, which continued until saturating the data. The strategies recommended by Guba were used for evaluating the trustworthiness of the data. The data was analyzed with conventional content analysis method according to method suggested by Graneheim and Lundman. Results: Based on the results, two themes, nine categories, and 19 sub-categories were identified considering the challenges and barriers of humanitarian aid and donors' management during the 2017 Kermanshah Earthquake. The categories included education, command and coordination, communication and information, rules, security, traffic and overcrowding, assessment, providing system, and cultural setting. Also, two themes including managerial and structural barriers were extracted. Conclusion: Adopting an effective management and appropriate policies with respect to humanitarian aid and modifying structural and managerial barriers can improve the performance and management of humanitarian aid.

No abstract

No abstract