Metformin, one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of type II diabetes, was recently found to exert its therapeutic effects, at least in part, by activating the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). However, the site of its action, as well as the mechanism to activate AMPK, remains elusive. Here we report how metformin activates AMPK. In cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells, metformin dose-dependently activated AMPK in parallel with increased detection of reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Further, either depletion of mitochondria or adenoviral overexpression of superoxide dismutases, as well as inhibition of nitric-oxide synthase, abolished the metformin-enhanced phosphorylations and activities of AMPK, implicating that activation of AMPK by metformin might be mediated by the mitochondria-derived RNS. Furthermore, administration of metformin, which increased 3-nitrotyrosine staining in hearts of C57BL6, resulted in parallel activation of AMPK in the aorta and hearts of C57BL6 mice but not in those of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) knockout mice in which metformin had no effect on 3-nitrotyrosine staining. Because the eNOS knockout mice expressed normal levels of AMPK-␣ that was activated by 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside, an AMPK agonist, these data indicate that RNS generated by metformin is required for AMPK activation in vivo. In addition, metformin significantly increased the coimmunoprecipitation of AMPK and its upstream kinase, LKB1, in C57BL6 mice administered to metformin in vivo. Using pharmacological and genetic inhibitors, we found that inhibition of either c-Src or PI3K abolished AMPK that was enhanced by metformin. We conclude that activation of AMPK by metformin might be mediated by mitochondria-derived RNS, and activation of the c-Src/PI3K pathway might generate a metabolite or other molecule inside the cell to promote AMPK activation by the LKB1 complex.

BackgroundReliable data on the distribution of causes of death (COD) in a population are fundamental to good public health practice. In the absence of comprehensive medical certification of deaths, the only feasible way to collect essential mortality data is verbal autopsy (VA). The Tariff Method was developed by the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC) to ascertain COD from VA information. Given its potential for improving information about COD, there is interest in refining the method. We describe the further development of the Tariff Method.MethodsThis study uses data from the PHMRC and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia studies. Gold standard clinical diagnostic criteria for hospital deaths were specified for a target cause list. VAs were collected from families using the PHMRC verbal autopsy instrument including health care experience (HCE). The original Tariff Method (Tariff 1.0) was trained using the validated PHMRC database for which VAs had been collected for deaths with hospital records fulfilling the gold standard criteria (validated VAs). In this study, the performance of Tariff 1.0 was tested using VAs from household surveys (community VAs) collected for the PHMRC and NHMRC studies. We then corrected the model to account for the previous observed biases of the model, and Tariff 2.0 was developed. The performance of Tariff 2.0 was measured at individual and population levels using the validated PHMRC database.ResultsFor median chance-corrected concordance (CCC) and mean cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) accuracy, and for each of three modules with and without HCE, Tariff 2.0 performs significantly better than the Tariff 1.0, especially in children and neonates. Improvement in CSMF accuracy with HCE was 2.5 %, 7.4 %, and 14.9 % for adults, children, and neonates, respectively, and for median CCC with HCE it was 6.0 %, 13.5 %, and 21.2 %, respectively. Similar levels of improvement are seen in analyses without HCE.ConclusionsTariff 2.0 addresses the main shortcomings of the application of the Tariff Method to analyze data from VAs in community settings. It provides an estimation of COD from VAs with better performance at the individual and population level than the previous version of this method, and it is publicly available for use.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0527-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Covered stents are a feasible alternative to open repair in properly selected patients with subclavian or axillary artery injury, resulting in shorter procedure time and less blood loss.