Most of our understanding of Drosophila heterochromatin structure and evolution has come from the annotation of heterochromatin from the isogenic y; cn bw sp strain. However, almost nothing is known about the heterochromatin's structural dynamics and evolution. Here, we focus on a 180-kb heterochromatic locus producing Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNA cluster), the flamenco (flam) locus, known to be responsible for the control of at least three transposable elements (TEs). We report its detailed structure in three different Drosophila lines chosen according to their capacity to repress or not to repress the expression of two retrotransposons named ZAM and Idefix, and we show that they display high structural diversity. Numerous rearrangements due to homologous and nonhomologous recombination, deletions and segmental duplications, and loss and gain of TEs are diverse sources of active genomic variation at this locus. Notably, we evidence a correlation between the presence of ZAM and Idefix in this piRNA cluster and their silencing. They are absent from flam in the strain where they are derepressed. We show that, unexpectedly, more than half of the flam locus results from recent TE insertions and that most of the elements concerned are prone to horizontal transfer between species of the melanogaster subgroup. We build a model showing how such high and constant dynamics of a piRNA master locus open the way to continual emergence of new patterns of piRNA biogenesis leading to changes in the level of transposition control.RNAi | gene silencing | epigenetics O ver the course of evolution, transposable elements (TEs) have accumulated in the genomes of eukaryotes, where they can account for up to 85% of the DNA (1). Most of these sequences have lost their ability to transpose. They are now stable components of the genomes. Their conservation throughout evolution suggests that they may confer advantageous effects to their hosts. However, transposition of the copies that remain functional could generate deleterious mutations if they were not severely repressed by their host. RNAi, which is a gene-silencing mechanism triggered by small RNAs (reviewed in ref.2), has been identified as being the main cellular machinery involved in the "taming" of TEs (reviewed in refs. 3-5). RNAi pathways involve small RNAs of diverse families. Among them, Piwiinteracting RNAs (piRNAs) have been shown to be involved in TE silencing in the Drosophila ovary. These piRNAs, 23-29 nt long, are bound by the Argonaute proteins Piwi, Argonaute 3, or Aubergine. They are produced by discrete genomic loci named piRNA clusters, which have been described as containing vestiges of TEs (6). One of these loci, the flamenco (flam) locus, extends over 180 kilobases (kb) on the Drosophila X chromosome. It is proximal to the DISCO interacting protein 1 gene (DIP1) and close to pericentromeric heterochromatin. Before the identification of piRNAs, this locus had been shown to regulate the Gypsy retrotransposon (7, 8 (6) showed the potential for the flam cluster to pr...

BackgroundIn the Drosophila germ line, repeat-associated small interfering RNAs (rasiRNAs) ensure genomic stability by silencing endogenous transposable elements. This RNA silencing involves small RNAs of 26-30 nucleotides that are mainly produced from the antisense strand and function through the Piwi protein. Piwi belongs to the subclass of the Argonaute family of RNA interference effector proteins, which are expressed in the germline and in surrounding somatic tissues of the reproductive apparatus. In addition to this germ-line expression, Piwi has also been implicated in diverse functions in somatic cells.Principal FindingsHere, we show that two LTR retrotransposons from Drosophila melanogaster, ZAM and Idefix, are silenced by an RNA silencing pathway that has characteristics of the rasiRNA pathway and that specifically recognizes and destroys the sense-strand RNAs of the retrotransposons. This silencing depends on Piwi in the follicle cells surrounding the oocyte. Interestingly, this silencing is active in all the somatic tissues examined from embryos to adult flies. In these somatic cells, while the silencing still involves the strict recognition of sense-strand transcripts, it displays the marked difference of being independent of the Piwi protein. Finally, we present evidence that in all the tissues examined, the repression is controlled by the heterochromatic COM locus.ConclusionOur data shed further light on the silencing mechanism that acts to target Drosophila LTR retrotransposons in somatic cells throughout fly development. They demonstrate that different RNA silencing pathways are involved in ovarian versus other somatic tissues, since Piwi is necessary for silencing in the former tissues but is dispensable in the latter. They further demonstrate that these pathways are controlled by the heterochromatic COM locus which ensures the overall protection of Drosophila against the detrimental effects of random retrotransposon mobilization.