Background: Radiation exposure during nuclear cardiology procedures has received much attention and has prompted citations for radiation reduction. In 2010, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology recommended reducing the average patient study radiation exposure to <9 mSv in 50% of studies by 2014. Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has emerged within recent years, but current radiation exposure in cardiac nuclear PET laboratories is unknown. This study evaluated current reported patient radiation exposure from nuclear laboratories in the United States applying for Intersocietal Accreditation Commission accreditation for MPI using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or PET. Methods and Results: This was an analysis of nuclear cardiology studies submitted to the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission for either or both cardiac PET and SPECT accreditation. Cardiac SPECT data represented year 2015 while PET data combined years 2013 to 2015. Data was analyzed with χ 2 and Mann-Whitney U tests (reported as median, 25th percentile, and 75th percentile). Reported PET MPI radiation exposure for 111 laboratories (532 patient cases) was 3.7 (3.2–4.1) mSv per study with no geographic variation. Reported SPECT MPI radiation exposure for 665 laboratories (3067 patient studies) was 12.8 (12.2–14.3) mSv. Highest radiation exposure was found in the South region. Technetium-only studies resulted in a median of 12.2 mSv per study. Conclusions: Radiation exposure from cardiac PET MPI in US laboratories applying for Intersocietal Accreditation Commission accreditation is low (111 laboratories, 3.7 mSv) and substantially lower than cardiac SPECT (665 laboratories, 12.8 mSv).

No abstract

In practice, screening is often disorganized and many initial screens occur after a fracture. This study shows that the UK FRAX tool with NOGG guidance would not have recommended treatment for many high-risk individuals before their fracture. Future health policies must clarify how best to screen, risk stratify, and treat individuals, particularly older adults who are at disproportionately higher risk of fracture and for whom the implications of fracture are greater. 10

No abstract

No abstract