Injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament frequently occur under combined mechanisms of knee loading. This in vitro study was designed to measure levels of ligament force under dual combinations of individual loading states and to determine which combinations generated high force. Resultant force was recorded as the knee was extended passively from 90 degrees of flexion to 5 degrees of hyperextension under constant tibial loadings. The individual loading states were 100 N of anterior tibial force, 10 Nm of varus and valgus moment, and 10 Nm of internal and external tibial torque. Straight anterior tibial force was the most direct loading mechanisms; the mean ligament force was approximately equal to applied anterior tibial force near 30 degrees of flexion and to 150% of applied tibial force at full extension. The addition of internal tibial torque to a knee loaded by anterior tibial force produced dramatic increases of force at full extension and hyperextension. This loading combination produced the highest ligament forces recorded in the study and is the most dangerous in terms of potential injury to the ligament. In direct contrast, the addition of external tibial torque to a knee loaded by anterior tibial force decreased the force dramatically for flexed positions of the knee; at close to 90 degrees of flexion, the anterior cruciate ligament became completely unloaded. The addition of varus moment to a knee loaded by anterior tibial force increased the force in extension and hyperextension, whereas the addition of valgus moment increased the force at flexed positions. These states of combined loading also could present an increased risk for injury. Internal tibial torque is an important loading mechanism of the anterior cruciate ligament for an extended knee. The overall risk of injury to the ligament from varus or valgus moment applied in combination with internal tibial torque is similar to the risk from internal tibial torque alone. External tibial torque was a relatively unimportant mechanism for generating anterior cruciate ligament force.
Biparietal diameter measurement is the most widely accepted means of determining gestational age. However, a standard anatomic plane for performing this measurement has not been established. Three hundred forty-four measurements on 256 patients who gave birth to normal infants were obtained and compared at various cranial levels based on brain anatomy. The results document that use of a standardized plane increases measurement reliability but does not significantly alter variability. We postulate that variability is based predominantly on biologic variation in fetal growth rates rather than on technical errors.
We assessed the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting clinically significant lesions of the anterior horn of the meniscus by reviewing 947 consecutive knee magnetic resonance imaging reports. Of these, 76 (8%) indicated a tear of the anterior horn of the medial or lateral meniscus. Thirty-one of these 76 patients underwent a subsequent arthroscopic examination, and their operative reports were reviewed. The 45 patients who were not examined arthroscopically were contacted and interviewed for clinical follow-up. Among the 31 patients who underwent arthroscopic examination, 8 anterior horn tears were noted in the predicted area (26% true-positive results), 23 patients had intact anterior horns (74% false-positive results), and 18 had normal intact menisci in all zones. Of the 45 patients who did not undergo arthroscopic surgery, 6 had isolated anterior horn tears reported on magnetic resonance imaging, and 5 of the 6 were asymptomatic at follow-up. The other 39 patients had multiple pathologic conditions noted on the magnetic resonance imaging report and continued to report knee pain at the follow-up interview. Increased signal intensity at the anterior horn of the meniscus seen on magnetic resonance imaging commonly does not represent a clinically significant lesion. We recommend correlation with the physical examination when interpreting this "positive" finding on knee magnetic resonance imaging examinations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.