This paper describes a computer-assisted non-existence proof of 9-input sorting networks consisting of 24 comparators, hence showing that the 25-comparator sorting network found by Floyd in 1964 is optimal. As a corollary, we obtain that the 29-comparator network found by Waksman in 1969 is optimal when sorting 10 inputs. This closes the two smallest open instances of the optimal-size sorting network problem, which have been open since the results of Floyd and Knuth from 1966 proving optimality for sorting networks of up to 8 inputs. The proof involves a combination of two methodologies: one based on exploiting the abundance of symmetries in sorting networks, and the other based on an encoding of the problem to that of satisfiability of propositional logic. We illustrate that, while each of these can single-handedly solve smaller instances of the problem, it is their combination that leads to the more efficient solution that scales to handle 9 inputs.
The subjects of this paper are a new definition of the notion "self-dual Hilbert
C*
-module" as a- categorical concept of Banach
C*
-moduli, and the conditions for some Hilbert
C*-moduli to be self-dual or
C*
-reflexive. The isomorphism of any two Hilbert structures on a given self-dual Hilbert
C*
-module inducing equivalent norms to the given one is stated. A topological criterion of self-duality and
C*
reflexivity of Hilbert
W*
-moduIi is proved. A criterion of self-duality of the countably generated Hilbert
\mathcal A
-module
l_2(\mathcal A)
is stated for arbitrary
C*
-algebras
\mathcal A$. As an application the classification of countably generated Hilbert W*modimli by their structure is given.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.