Reducing nonpoint source pollution is an ongoing challenge in watersheds throughout the world. Implementation of best management practices, both structural and nonstructural, is the usual response to this challenge, with the presumption that they are effective. However, monitoring of their efficacy is not a standard practice. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of two wetland restoration projects, designed to handle runoff during high flow events and serve as flow-through retention basins before returning flow further downstream. The Macatawa Watershed is located in west Michigan, is heavily agricultural, and drains into Lake Macatawa, a hypereutrophic lake with total phosphorus concentrations usually exceeding 100 µg/L. We measured turbidity, total phosphorus, and soluble reactive phosphorus both upstream and downstream of these wetland complexes during base flow and storm events. While both turbidity and phosphorus increased significantly during storm events compared to baseflow, we found no significant difference in upstream vs. downstream water quality two years following BMP construction. We also measured water quality in Lake Macatawa, and found the lake remained highly impaired. Possible reasons for the lack of improved water quality: (1) The restored wetlands are too young to function optimally in sediment and phosphorus retention; (2) the scale of these BMPs is too small given the overall loads; (3) the locations of these BMPs are not optimal in terms of pollutant reduction; and (4) the years following postconstruction were relatively dry so the wetlands had limited opportunity to retain pollutants. These possibilities are evaluated.
Eutrophication is a major problem in lakes and rivers throughout the world. One such system is Lake Macatawa, located in West Michigan, which hydrologically connects to Lake Michigan. Lake Macatawa and its watershed suffer from excess phosphorus and sediment loads. The total maximum daily load for the lake calls for a total phosphorus (TP) reduction of 75%, which would reduce the water column total phosphorus concentration from 125 μg/L to 50 μg/L. Understanding how P moves through this landscape, into Lake Macatawa, and ultimately to Lake Michigan and the St. Lawrence Seaway, is critical to managing and controlling P runoff. A potentially significant source of P to Lake Macatawa occurs through agricultural tile drainage. Various best management practices (BMPs) have been implemented in the Macatawa watershed to reduce P loading, especially surface runoff, but their overall effectiveness has been limited. Electric arc furnace (EAF) slag, a waste product from the steel industry, can chemically bind P and has been used previously in agricultural settings. Three iron slag filters were installed at the end of agricultural tile lines in the Macatawa watershed and evaluated to assess their effectiveness in removing P, while also monitoring for the presence of potentially toxic chemicals leaching from the slag. After 1 year of slag filter performance, both SRP (soluble reactive phosphorus) and TP decreased in the tile drain effluent: percent reductions of soluble reactive phosphorus and TP ranged from 7.4% to 57.3% and 59.5–76.5%, respectively. Absolute concentrations of TP were reduced to between 100 and 329 μg/L, which still exceeds the 50 μg/L goal for Lake Macatawa. Concentrations of toxic metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons compounds, and cyanide all were at levels below drinking water standards. Our preliminary conclusions are that the installation of these filters should be targeted to areas where tile drain effluent P levels are very high (SRP > 250 μg/L) to obtain an optimal cost/benefit ratio. While they are not a panacea, when installed in combination with other BMPs (Best Management Practices), EAF slag filters may play an important localized role in reducing P to Lake Macatawa and farther downstream.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.