Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr is a virion-associated, regulatory protein that is required for efficient viral replication in monocytes/macrophages. The protein is believed to act in conjunction with the Gag matrix protein to allow import of the viral preintegration complex in nondividing cells. In cells, Vpr localizes to the nucleus. Recently, we showed that Vpr prevents the activation of p34 cdc2-cyclin B. This results in arrest of Vpr-expressing cells in the G 2 /M phase of the cell cycle. Here, we use a panel of expression vectors encoding Vpr molecules mutated in the amino-terminal alpha-helical region, the central hydrophobic region, or the carboxy-terminal basic region to define the functional domains of the protein. The results showed cell cycle arrest was largely controlled by the carboxy-terminal basic domain of the protein. In contrast, the aminoterminal alpha-helical region of Vpr was required for nuclear localization and packaging into virions. The carboxy terminus appeared to be unnecessary for nuclear localization. In the alpha-helical region, mutation of Ala-30 to Pro resulted in a protein that localized to the cytoplasm. Surprisingly, fusion of Vpr to luciferase resulted in a molecule that failed to localize to the nucleus. In addition, we show that simian immunodeficiency virus Vpr, but not Vpx, induces G 2 arrest. We speculate that Vpr has two sites for interaction with cellular factors: one in the alpha-helical region that specifies nuclear localization and one in the carboxy-terminal domain that is required for Cdc2 inhibition.

No abstract

Introduction Homologous recombination repair (HRR) is a critical pathway for the repair of DNA damage caused by cisplatin or PARP inhibitors. HRR may be impaired by multiple mechanisms in cancer, which complicates assessing the functional HRR status in cells. Here, we monitored the ability of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells to form subnuclear foci of DNA repair proteins as a surrogate of HRR proficiency. Methods We assessed clonogenic survival of 16 NSCLC cell lines in response to cisplatin, mitomycin C (MMC), and the PARP inhibitor olaparib. Thirteen tumor explants from NSCLC patients were subjected to cisplatin ex-vivo. Cells were assayed for foci of repair-associated proteins such as BRCA1, FANCD2, RAD51, and γ-H2AX. Results Four cell lines (25%) showed an impaired RAD51 foci forming ability in response to cisplatin. Impaired foci formation correlated with cellular sensitivity to cisplatin and MMC as well as olaparib. Foci responses complemented or superseded genomic information suggesting alterations in the ATM/ATR and FA/BRCA pathways. Because baseline foci in untreated cells did not predict drug sensitivity we adapted an ex-vivo biomarker assay to monitor damage-induced RAD51 foci in NSCLC explants from patients. Ex-vivo cisplatin treatment of explants identified 2 tumors (15%) exhibiting compromised RAD51 foci induction. Conclusions A fraction of NSCLC harbors HRR defects that may sensitize the affected tumors to DNA damaging agents including PARP inhibitors. We propose that foci-based functional biomarker assays represent a powerful tool for prospective determination of treatment sensitivity, but will require ex-vivo techniques for induction of DNA damage to unmask the underlying HRR defect.

Oncolytic cancer therapy using herpes simplex viruses (HSV) that have direct tumoricidal effects and cancer immunotherapy using the cytokine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have each been effective in preclinical testing. NV1034 is a multi-mutated oncolytic HSV carrying the gene for murine GM-CSF that attempts to combine these two anticancer strategies. The purpose of this study was to compare NV1034 to NV1023, the parent HSV mutants lacking GM-CSF, in order to determine if such combined oncolytic and immunotherapy using a single vector has advantages over oncolytic therapy alone. In vitro, expression GM-CSF did not alter the infectivity, in vitro cytotoxicity, or replication of NV1034 compared to the non-cytokine secreting control. Tumors infected with NV1034 produced GM-CSF in picogram quantities. In vivo efficacy of the viruses against murine colorectal carcinoma CT26 and murine hepatoma Hepa l-6 was then tested in subcutaneous tumors in syngeneic Balb/c and C57 L/J mice respectively. In these immune competent models, NV1034 or NV1023 each demonstrated potent antitumor activity. Treatment with NV1034 had significantly better antitumor effect compared to treatment with NV1023. Furthermore, in mice depleted of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes, there was no difference in the antitumor efficacy of these viruses. Viral vectors combining oncolytic and immunotherapy are promising agents in treatment of colorectal carcinoma and hepatoma.

Replication-competent oncolytic herpes simplex viruses (HSV), modified by deletion of certain viral growth genes, can selectively target malignant cells. The viral growth gene g 1 34.5 has significant homology to GADD34 (growth arrest and DNA damage protein 34), which promotes cell cycle arrest and DNA repair in response to stressors such as radiation (XRT). By upregulating GADD34, XRT may result in greater oncolytic activity of HSV strains deficient in the g 1 34.5 gene. The human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines KMBC, SK-ChA-1 and YoMi were treated with NV1023, an oncolytic HSV lacking one copy of g 1 34.5. Viral proliferation assays were performed at a multiplicity of infection (MOI, number of viral particles per tumor cell) equal to 1, either alone or after XRT at 250 or 500 cGy. Viral replication was assessed by plaque assay. In vitro cytotoxicity assays were performed using virus at MOIs of 0.01 and 0.1, with or without XRT at 250 cGy and cell survival determined with lactate dehydrogenase assay. Established flank tumors in athymic mice were treated with a single intratumoral injection of virus (10 3 or 10 4 plaque forming units), either alone or after a single dose of XRT at 500 cGy, and tumor volumes measured. RT-PCR was used to measure GADD34 mRNA levels in all cell lines after a single dose of XRT at 250 or 500 cGy. NV1023 was tumoricidal in all three cell lines, but sensitivity to the virus varied.XRT enhanced viral replication in vitro in all cell lines. Combination treatment with low-dose XRT and virus was highly tumoricidal, both in vitro and in vivo. The greatest tumor volume reduction with combination therapy was seen with YoMi cells, the only cell line with increased GADD34 expression after XRT and the only cell line in which a synergistic treatment effect was suggested. In KMBC and SK-ChA-1 cells, neither of which showed increased GADD34 expression after XRT, tumor volume reduction was less pronounced and there was no suggestion of a synergistic effect in either case. Oncolytic HSV are effective in treating human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines, although sensitivity to virus varies. XRT-enhanced viral replication occurs through a mechanism that is not necessarily dependent on GADD34 upregulation. However, XRT-induced upregulation of GADD34 further promotes tumoricidal activity in viral strains deficient in the g 1 34.5 gene, resulting in treatment synergy; this effect is cell type dependent. Combined XRT and oncolytic viral therapy is a potentially important treatment strategy that may enhance the therapeutic ratios of both individual therapies.