Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine USAF physician assistants' (PAs') concerns regarding postgraduate education and training. Methods This was a single-mode, observational, cross-sectional study using an anonymous-structured survey involving a population of 420 active duty USAF PAs. Potential participants were contacted by email and asked to take a one-time survey via a secure survey site link. Results One hundred ten USAF PAs participated in the survey seeking their opinions on factors affecting applying for military postgraduate specialty training. The prime factors identified fell into 3 major groups of concern: types of degrees offered, current job satisfaction, and types of specialty training available. The most desired degree and specialty options were the doctorate of science and emergency medicine. Only a small number of respondents (6%) expressed current job satisfaction and the desire to remain in family medicine. Conclusions This study revealed important information to senior leaders who fund, recruit, train, and maintain force-readiness requirements. The 3 identified main priorities of respondents were the types of degrees, current level of job satisfaction, and the types of specialty training. The vast majority of those surveyed preferred the doctorate, which is what all of the specialty degrees in the Air Force are, except for ENT.

Osteomyelitis is a common occurrence in children and typically has a prolonged treatment course involving multiple specialties. Historically, the long bones are most commonly affected and Staphylococcus aureus is the primary causative organism. This case shows the value of using the Kocher criteria and acute phase reactant C-reactive protein as diagnostic tools that can be used to advocate MRI to rule out this potentially devastating process.

No abstract

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a clinical challenge in risk assessment, recognition, treatment, and prevention. This article explores the pathogenesis, presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of AAA.

Objective: This study evaluated the competence of Advanced Cardiac Life Support certified personnel at hands-on ACLS skills. Methods: The observational, cross-sectional study assessed participants' subjective confidence and objective skills using the ACLS mega code examination. Testing was performed with a Laerdal manikin and standardized code carts. Results: Participants had a 12% (6% to 22%, 95% CI) pass rate for the stable tachyarrhythmia scenario and a 57% (44% to 69%, 95% CI) pass rate for the unstable tachyarrhythmia scenario. The most significant skills missed were appropriate medications and postconversion maintenance in the stable scenario and appropriate energy selection and successful shock delivery for the unstable scenario. Conclusions: ACLS providers feel confident in their ACLS skills; however, actual performance demonstrated poor performance in the management of patients with stable and unstable tachyarrhythmias. The recommendation is to observe initial and recertification ACLS classes to investigate the standard to which these core skills are being taught and evaluated.