In a meta-analysis of the available literature on time to AC, longer time to AC was associated with worse survival among patients with resected colorectal cancer.
Our multimodal multidisciplinary fast-track protocol reduced hospital stay and opioid consumption while maintaining a high level of patient safety. Program implementation is feasible both in tertiary care and in community hospitals.
The relationship between survival and time to the start of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among breast cancer patients is unclear. In order to illustrate the effect of delaying the initiation of AC on survival we have undertaken a systematic review and meta-analysis. We identified 12 available studies in the meta-analysis including 15 independent analytical groups. This meta-analysis showed that a 4-week delay before AC was associated with a significantly worse overall survival (OS)(HR=1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.19) and disease free survival (DFS)(HR=1.14; 95%CI, 1.05-1.24). Two studies categorized patients into hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-positive, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients according to the clinicopathological features of breast cancer. The HRs for OS between waiting time (WT) ≤30 days and 31-60 days in the subgroups were extracted and analyzed. The analysis demonstrated that a WT of 31-60 days was related to worse OS among patients with TNBC (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.48), but had no significant effect on OS among those with hormone receptor-positive (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.15) or ERBB2-postive (HR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.79-1.14) tumors. In this meta-analysis of the eligible literatures reviewing the time to AC, a longer waiting time to adjuvant chemotherapy may lead to worse survival in breast cancer patients, especially in TNBC patients. www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.