Background: Although commonly prescribed, the evidence to support exercises therapy (ET) and conservative management for the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears (FTT) is equivocal. Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review of the literature was to determine the current level of evidence available for ET in the treatment of FTT and to provide a formal Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group of recommendation. Methods: Five databases were systematically searched to evaluate the effectiveness of ET for FTT. Inclusion criteria: experimental or observational studies of adults clinically diagnosed with FTT, or massive, or inoperable tears that contained a treatment group that received ET for FTT. Exclusion criteria included: history of surgical repair, concurrent significant trauma, neurological impairment, and level V studies. Articles were assessed for quality, the level of evidence (I-V) and GRADE of recommendation (A to F) was determined. Data extraction included: demographics, specific interventions, and outcomes. Results: One thousand, five-hundred and sixty-nine unique citations were identified, 35 studies were included: nine randomized controlled studies, six cohort studies, 15 case series and five case reports. There were 2010 shoulders in 1913 subjects with an average age of 64.2 years, 54% males, 73% of tears were >1 cm and 37% were classified as massive. Based on studies that reported, >58% of tears were >1 year and 73% were atraumatic. Of the non-operatively treated cohorts that reported the respective outcomes: 78% improved in pain (9/10 cohorts that reported statistically significant differences [stat-sig] p<0.05), 81% improved in ROM (14/14 cohorts that reported, met stat-sig), 85% improved in strength (7/8 cohorts that reported, met stat-sig), 84% improved in functional outcomes (17/17 cohorts that reported, met stat-sig). Dissatisfied outcomes occurred in 15% of patients, who then transitioned to surgery. Conclusion: The current literature indicates GRADE B recommendation (moderate strength) to support the use of ET in the management of FTT. There is further need for well-designed randomized controlled trials.
Knowledge of muscular forces and adaptations with hamstring-specific exercises can optimize exercise prescription and tendon remodeling; however, studies investigating the effectiveness of the current conservative management of proximal hamstring tendinopathy (PHT) and outcomes are lacking. The purpose of this review is to provide insights into the efficacy of conservative therapeutic interventions in the management of PHT. In January 2022, databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase were searched for studies assessing the effectiveness of conservative intervention compared with that of a placebo or combination of treatments on functional outcomes and pain. Studies that performed conservative management (exercise therapy and/or physical therapy modalities) in adults 18–65 years were included. Studies that performed surgical interventions or whose subjects had complete hamstring rupture/avulsion greater than a 2 cm displacement were excluded. A total of 13 studies were included: five studies compared exercise interventions, while eight studies investigated a multimodal approach of either shockwave therapy and exercise or a hybrid model incorporating exercise, shockwave therapy, and other modalities, such as ultrasound, trigger point needling, or instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization. This review supports the notion that the conservative management of PHT may best be optimized through a multimodal approach incorporating a combination of tendon-specific loading at an increased length, lumbopelvic stabilization exercises, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy. With regard to hamstring-specific exercise selection, PHT may be optimally managed by including a progressive loading program at combined angles of the hip flexion at 110 degrees and the knee flexion between 45 and 90 degrees.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.