For over 25 years, our group has used regenerative medicine strategies to develop improved biomaterials for use in congenital heart surgery. Among other applications, we developed a tissue-engineered vascular graft (TEVG) by seeding tubular biodegradable polymeric scaffolds with autologous bone marrow–derived mononuclear cells. Results of our first-in-human study demonstrated feasibility as the TEVG transformed into a living vascular graft having an ability to grow, making it the first engineered graft with growth potential. Yet, outcomes of this first Food and Drug Administration–approved clinical trial evaluating safety revealed a prohibitively high incidence of early TEVG stenosis, preventing the widespread use of this promising technology. Mechanistic studies in mouse models provided important insight into the development of stenosis and enabled advanced computational models. Computational simulations suggested both a novel inflammation-driven, mechano-mediated process of in vivo TEVG development and an unexpected natural history, including spontaneous reversal of the stenosis. Based on these in vivo and in silico discoveries, we have been able to rationally design strategies for inhibiting TEVG stenosis that have been validated in preclinical large animal studies and translated to the clinic via a new Food and Drug Administration–approved clinical trial. This progress would not have been possible without the multidisciplinary approach, ranging from small to large animal models and computational simulations. This same process is expected to lead to further advances in scaffold design, and thus next generation TEVGs.

Patch augmentation of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and pulmonary artery (PA) arterioplasty are relatively common procedures in the surgical treatment of patients with congenital heart disease. To date, several patch materials have been applied with no agreed upon clinical standard. Each patch type has unique performance characteristics, cost, and availability. There are limited data describing the various advantages and disadvantages of different patch materials. We performed a review of studies describing the clinical performance of various RVOT and PA patch materials and found a limited but growing body of literature. Short-term clinical performance has been reported for a multitude of patch types, but comparisons are limited by inconsistent study design and scarce histologic data. Standard clinical criteria for assessment of patch efficacy and criteria for intervention need to be applied across patch types. The field is progressing with improvements in outcomes due to newer patch technologies focused on reducing antigenicity and promoting neotissue formation which may have the ability to grow, remodel, and repair.