Despite a large body of research, extant findings on the functional role of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) in phonological and semantic fluency are still controversial. Based on cross-study comparisons, a recent meta-analysis of neuroimaging results suggests that posteriordorsal (Brodmann area, BA, 44) and anterior-ventral parts (BA 45) of LIFG contribute differentially to processes of phonologically and semantically cued word retrieval, respectively. In contrast, a subsequent functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment failed to validate the proposed dissociation using a within-subjects design. In particular, no evidence for a specific role of BA 45 in semantic fluency was found. Here, we resolve this apparent controversy by showing that the conflicting findings can be accounted for when considering the influence of task demands and individual ability on resulting functional magnetic resonance imaging activation patterns. By comparing phonological versus semantic fluency, higher activation was robustly observed in BA 44. For the opposite comparison, higher activation was found in dorsal BA 45; however, this was more pronounced in posterior-dorsal parts of BA 45 for low-performing subjects and was only apparent in anterior-dorsal parts of BA 45 under high demands on controlled semantic retrieval. Our results thus disclose important determinants for detecting a functional segregation of LIFG in verbal fluency that also have implications for the controversial findings in previous lesion studies. Moreover, the present parcellation of dorsal BA 45 corresponds well with anatomical evidence suggesting a subdivision into an anterior (45A) and posterior part (45B) and may therefore represent evidence for its functional significance in humans.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.