Aim To retrospectively compare the initial response, local recurrence, and complication rates of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) vs microwave ablation (MWA) when combined with neoadjuvant bland transarterial embolization (TAE) or drug eluting microsphere chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods A total of 35 subjects with BCLC very early and early stage HCC (range 1.2 – 4.1 cm) underwent TAE (23) or TACE (12) with RFA (15) or MWA (20) from 1/2009–6/2015 as either definitive therapy or a bridge to transplant. TAE and TACE were performed with 40–400 μm particles and 30–100 μm plus either Doxorubicin or Epirubicin eluting microspheres respectively. Initial response and local progression were evaluated using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Complications were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Results Complete response (CR) rates were 80% (12/15) for RFA + TAE/TACE and 95% (19/20) for MWA + TAE/TACE (p value 0.29). Local recurrence (LR) was 30% (4/12) for RFA + TAE/TACE and 0% (0/19) for MWA + TAE/TACE. Durability of response (DR), defined as local disease control for duration of the study, demonstrated a significant difference in favor of MWA (p value 0.0091). There was no statistical difference in complication rates (3 vs 2). Conclusions MWA and RFA when combined with neoadjuvant TAE or TACE have similar safety and efficacy in the treatment of early stage HCC. MWA provided more durable disease control in this study, however, prospective data remains necessary to evaluate superiority of either modality.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare posttransplant outcomes in patients undergoing bridging locoregional therapy (LRT) with Y-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) based protocol compared with transarterial chemoembolization based protocol for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prior liver transplantation (LT). Materials and Methods: Patients listed for LT with HCC within the Milan criteria at our center who had bridging LRT were treated according to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) based protocol from May 2012 to April 2014 and a TARE based protocol from October 2014 to December 2017. Early posttransplant survival and tumor recurrence were compared between the groups. Tumor response to LRT, microvascular invasion (mVI), and the rate of delisting was also evaluated. Results: One hundred three patients who were listed for LT with HCC within the Milan criteria received LRT. LT was performed in 65 patients, 28 treated with TARE protocol and 37 on TACE protocol. There were no statistical differences in baseline pretransplant characteristics and tumor recurrence. There was a trend toward improved 3-year survival in the TARE group (92.9% vs. 75.7%; P=0.052). The mVI was seen in 1/28 (3.6%) explants in the TARE group compared with 10/37 (27%) in the TACE group (P=0.013). The TARE group also required fewer LRT treatments (1.46 vs. 2.43; P=0.001) despite no difference in time on the transplant list. Conclusions: Despite requiring fewer LRT treatments, there was significantly less mVI in the explants of patients treated with TARE protocol LRT as a bridge to LT as well as a trend toward improved 3-year survival. Therefore, TARE may be associated with improved tumor control and reduced post-LT recurrence.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

No abstract