ObjectiveMeningeal involvement in Immunoglobulin G (IgG)-4-related disease is rare and only described in case reports and series. Because a review into the disease is lacking, we present 2 cases followed by a literature review of IgG4-related hypertrophic pachymeningitis (IgG4-HP).MethodsTwo IgG4-HP cases were reported, one involving the spinal cord and responding to surgical management and a second involving the brain and responding to Rituximab therapy. We then review clinical cases and case-series of histologically proven IgG4-HP that were published in the PubMed-NCBI database.ResultsForty-two case reports and 5 case-series were studied (60 patients, 20 women). The median age was 53. Eighteen patients had systemic involvement and 24 had single-organ IgG4-HP. Fifty-five percent of patients had an elevated serum IgG4. Treatment was surgical in 20/53 cases. Steroid therapy and immunosuppressors were effective in 85% and more than 90% of the cases, respectively. The rate of disease relapse was 42.1% after steroid therapy was discontinued.Discussion/conclusionIgG4-HP is characterized by the lack of extra-neurologic organ-involvement and systemic signs. Histopathologic studies should be performed as it is crucial for diagnosis because serum markers are rarely informative. 18F-FDG positon tomography can be useful to characterize systemic forms. There is no specific CSF marker for IgG4-HP and the diagnostic value of CSF IgG4 levels needs to be studied with larger samples. We provide a treatment algorithm for IgG4-HP. Such treatment strategies rely on early surgery, steroids, and early immunosuppressive therapy to prevent neurologic complications.
Background and ObjectivesKappa free light chains (KFLC) seem to efficiently diagnose MS. However, extensive cohort studies are lacking to establish consensus cut-offs, notably to rule out non-MS autoimmune CNS disorders. Our objectives were to (1) determine diagnostic performances of CSF KFLC, KFLC index, and KFLC intrathecal fraction (IF) threshold values that allow us to separate MS from different CNS disorder control populations and compare them with oligoclonal bands' (OCB) performances and (2) to identify independent factors associated with KFLC quantification in MS.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 13 French MS centers. Patients were included if they had a noninfectious and nontumoral CNS disorder, eligible data concerning CSF and serum KFLC, albumin, and OCB. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to their diagnosis: MS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), other inflammatory CNS disorders (OIND), and noninflammatory CNS disorder controls (NINDC).ResultsOne thousand six hundred twenty-one patients were analyzed (675 MS, 90 CIS, 297 OIND, and 559 NINDC). KFLC index and KFLC IF had similar performances in diagnosing MS from nonselected controls and OIND (p= 0.123 andp= 0.991 for area under the curve [AUC] comparisons) and performed better than CSF KFLC (p< 0.001 for all AUC comparisons). A KFLC index of 8.92 best separated MS/CIS from the entire nonselected control population, with better performances than OCB (p< 0.001 for AUC comparison). A KFLC index of 11.56 best separated MS from OIND, with similar performances than OCB (p= 0.065). In the multivariate analysis model, female gender (p= 0.003), young age (p= 0.013), and evidence of disease activity (p< 0.001) were independent factors associated with high KFLC index values in patients with MS, whereas MS phenotype, immune-modifying treatment use at sampling, and the FLC analyzer type did not influence KFLC index.DiscussionKFLC biomarkers are efficient tools to separate patients with MS from controls, even when compared with other patients with CNS autoimmune disorder. Given these results, we suggest using KFLC index or KFLC IF as a criterion to diagnose MS.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that KFLC index or IF can be used to differentiate patients with MS from nonselected controls and from patients with other autoimmune CNS disorders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.