The glutamate hypothesis proposes that N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor hypofunction underlies cognitive and perhaps other schizophrenic symptoms. The present study used the odor span task to assess the effects of NMDA antagonists on remembering multiple stimuli in rodents. This task uses an incrementing nonmatching-to-sample procedure in which responses to a new olfactory stimulus are reinforced on each trial, whereas responses to previously presented stimuli are not. NMDA antagonists have been associated with memory impairments in a variety of animal models; however, there are inconsistencies across different NMDA antagonists and tasks used. The current study compared the acute effects of phencyclidine (PCP), ketamine (KET), and the novel NMDA antagonist methoxetamine (MXE) on responding in the odor span task and a simple discrimination control task. PCP and MXE impaired odor span accuracy at doses that did not impair simple discrimination in most rats; however, the effects of KET were less selective. Within-session analyses indicated that the effects of PCP and MXE depended on the number of stimuli to remember, that is, impairment only occurred when the memory load was relatively high. These effects of PCP and MXE were consistent with the hypothesis that NMDA antagonists may interfere with working memory, but the basis for less selective results with KET are unclear. (PsycINFO Database Record

There is a growing body of research on matching- and non-matching-to-sample (MTS, NMTS) relations with rats using olfactory stimuli; however, the specific characteristics of this relational control are unclear. In the current study we examine MTS and NMTS in rats with an automated olfactometer using a successive (go, no-go) procedure. Ten rats were trained to either match- or non-match-to-sample with common scents (apple, cinnamon, etc.) as olfactory stimuli. After matching or non-matching training with four odorants, rats were tested for transfer twice with four new odorants on each test. Most rats trained on MTS showed immediate transfer to new stimuli, and most rats trained on NMTS showed full transfer by the second set of new odors. After meeting criterion on the second transfer test, the contingencies were reversed with four new odor stimuli such that subjects trained on matching were shifted to non-matching and vice versa. Following these reversed contingencies, the effects of the original training persisted for many trials with new odorants. These data extend previous studies on same-different concept formation in rats, showing strong generalization requiring few exemplars. The critical role of olfactory stimuli is discussed.

The rodent odor span task (OST) uses an incrementing non-matching to sample procedure in which a series of odors is presented and selection of the session-novel odor is reinforced. An OST is frequently used to test the effects of neurobiological variables on memory capacity as the number of odors to remember increases during the course of the session. In this regard, one important finding has been that NMDA receptor antagonists selectively impair OST performance at doses that spare accuracy on control tasks. However, in many versions of the odor span task the number of stimuli to remember is confounded with the number of distractor odors presented to the rat on each trial. The present study compared the effects of the NMDA antagonist dizocilpine when the number of choices was held constant at two (one novel odor-S+ and one previously presented distractor odorS and nd when the number of choice stimuli was permitted to increase up to 10 (one S+ and 9 S-). Dizocilpine impaired OST accuracy at doses that had no effect on a reference memory control task in both 2-choice and 10-choice conditions; however, the doseresponse function was shifted to the left in the 10-choice tests. The impairments produced by dizocilpine were exacerbated as the memory load increased in both 2-and 10-choice conditions. These findings support the hypothesis that NMDA antagonism reduces the number of stimuli that rats can remember accurately, but the interaction between the effective DZP dose and the number of distractors shows that drug effects on OST performances may involve attentional factors in addition to memory capacity. The findings also demonstrate that variations in number of OST distractors can be used to alter sensitivity of the task.

The odor span task is an incrementing non-matching–to-sample procedure designed to provide an analysis of working memory capacity in rodents. The procedure takes place in an arena apparatus and rats are exposed to a series of odor stimuli in the form of scented lids with the selection of new stimuli reinforced. This procedure makes it possible to study drug effects as a function of the number of stimuli to remember. In the present study, the non-selective positive allosteric GABAA receptor modulator flunitrazepam impaired odor span performance at doses that did not affect a control odor discrimination. In contrast, the alpha-1 selective positive GABAA receptor modulator zolpidem and the cholinergic receptor antagonist scopolamine only impaired odor span at doses that produced more global impairment, including decreased accuracy in the control discrimination and increased response omissions in the both the odor span and control discrimination procedures. Even though the effects of flunitrazepam were selective to odor span performance, they did not depend on the number of stimuli to remember—the same degree of impairment occurred regardless of the memory load. These findings suggest that flunitrazepam interfered selectively with conditional discrimination performance rather than working memory and tentatively suggest that flunitrazepam’s selective effects in the odor span task relative to the control odor discrimination are mediated by one or more non-alpha1 GABAA receptor subtypes.

Two experiments examined the emergence of generalized identity matching in rats using a successive discrimination procedure with olfactory stimuli. Trials consisted of the presentation of two odors separated by a 1‐s interstimulus interval. Responses during the second odor presentation were reinforced only if the two odors were identical. In Experiment 1, rats were trained with two odors and then exposed to sessions that included unreinforced probe trials with novel odors. There was evidence of higher response rates on matching probe trials in some rats, but matching did not approach baseline levels. Additional training with four exemplars produced transfer to novel odors that was equivalent to baseline levels. Experiment 2 tested the possibility that detection of stimulus change, rather than generalized identity, was responsible for the transfer seen in Experiment 1. Thus, a masking odor was inserted during the 1‐s interstimulus interval so that stimulus change occurred on all trials. Although response rates on probe trials were lower than baseline rates, above chance transfer to novel stimuli was still observed in four of the five animals tested. These findings support the hypothesis that transfer of matching to novel odors in this successive matching‐to‐sample paradigm is based on a generalized identity relation.