The results of this study shed new light on providing timely information and palliative care to support carers. We call for health services to reconsider the current medical model for this patient group, where patients are the centre of care, information and support, towards a more collaborative model which places carers and patients into a partnership.

Background There is limited evidence to guide best approaches to supportive care delivery to patients with high-grade glioma. I-CoPE (Information, Coordination, Preparation and Emotional) is a structured supportive care approach for people with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma and their family carers. Delivered by a cancer care coordinator, I-CoPE consists of (1) staged information, (2) regular screening for needs, (3) communication and coordination, and (4) family carer engagement. This pilot study tested acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of I-CoPE, delivered over 3 transitions in the illness course, for people newly diagnosed with high-grade glioma and their carers. Methods I-CoPE was delivered at the identified transition times (at diagnosis, following the diagnostic hospitalization, following radiotherapy), with associated data collection (enrollment, 2 weeks, 12 weeks). Outcomes of interest included: acceptability/feasibility (primary); quality of life; needs for support; disease-related information needs; and carer preparedness to care (secondary). Descriptive statistics were used to assess acceptability outcomes, while patient and carer outcomes were assessed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results Thirty-two patients (53% male, mean age 60) and 31 carers (42% male) participated. I-CoPE was highly acceptable: 86% of eligible patients enrolled, and of these 88% completed the study. Following I-CoPE patients and carers reported fewer information needs (P < .001), while carers reported fewer unmet supportive care needs (P < .01) and increased preparedness to care (P = .04). Quality of life did not significantly change. Conclusion A model of supportive care delivered based upon illness transitions is feasible, acceptable, and suggests preliminary efficacy in some areas. Formal randomized studies are now required.

No abstract

Patients in this study had substantial needs, which were often not shared and not addressed by the current medical system of care. An improved multidisciplinary care model is indicated, which proactively (1) engages care coordination and advocacy; (2) minimises patients' sense of waiting and uncertainty through mapping out a plan, including involvement of palliative care in a timely fashion; and (3) actively invites discussion around goals and preferences for care to promote patients' sense of self.

High-grade malignant glioma patients face a poor prognosis, preceded by rapid functional and neurobehavioural changes, making multidisciplinary care incorporating supportive and palliative care important. This study aimed to quantify the association between symptoms,receipt of supportive and palliative care and site of death. We undertook a retrospective cohort study between 2003 and 2009 of incident malignant glioma cases who survived for at least 120 days between their first hospitalisation and their death (n = 678) in Victoria, Australia, using linked hospital, emergency department and death data. The median age of patients was 62 years, 40% were female, and the median survival was 11 months. Twenty-six percent of patients died outside of hospital, 49% in a palliative care bed/hospice setting and 25% in an acute hospital bed. Patients having 1 or more symptoms were more than five times as likely to receive palliative care. Patients who receive palliative care are 1.7 times more likely to die outside of hospital. In conclusion malignant glioma patients with a high burden of symptoms are more likely to receive palliative care and, in turn, patients who receive palliative care are more likely to die at home.