The L-RPLND has proved to be an excellent staging tool, which should be developed into a less-invasive alternative to primary open RPLND. The oncologic outcome of L-RPLND without adjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic stage II disease is being investigated.
Objectives: To compare bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a comparative prospective study at two urology centers. Methods: Of 212 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia entered prospectively into the study, 111 underwent bipolar and 101 monopolar TURP. Patients were treated in two consecutive series with each surgical method at both centers. Improvement in peak flow rate, postvoid residual, International Prostate Symptom Score, and quality of life score postoperatively and at 3, 12, 24 and 36 months, as well as long-term adverse events were compared. Regarding safety, duration of surgery, postoperative catheterization and hospitalization time, amount of fluid absorption, frequency of transurethral resection (TUR) syndrome, and risk of hemorrhage were evaluated. Results: Patient characteristics of the two series were comparable. The risk of developing TUR syndrome (p = 0.32) and bleeding tendency (p = 0.52) did not differ significantly between groups. Significant differences were seen for duration of surgery and resection speed. All functional parameters improved significantly during follow- up, with no relevant differences between surgical groups. Conclusions: Since no major differences in efficacy and safety were seen between the surgical groups, we feel that the monopolar technique still has a valuable place in TURP.
We compared bipolar and monopolar TURP in a prospective controlled study at two urology centers. The objective of the study was to establish whether there were differences between the two methods with regard to frequency of the transurethral resection (TUR) syndrome, amount of fluid absorbed during surgery, risk of hemorrhage, duration of postoperative catheterization and duration of hospitalization. The duration of surgery, improvement in maximum flow rate (Q-max), residual urine volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of Life (QoL) score were also compared. Overall, our study showed that there were no major differences between bipolar and monopolar TURP. During follow-up, the clinical efficacy of bipolar TURP has been maintained to the same degree as with the traditional method, with no significant differences for Q-max, IPSS and QoL scores after 1 year. Although the risk of developing TUR syndrome seemed to be smaller with bipolar resection (serum sodium change bipolar versus monopolar: þ 1.2 versus À0.1 mmol l À1 ), the bleeding tendency with both methods was the same (14.0 g l À1 hemoglobin loss after 1 day in both groups). On the basis of our findings, we think that the monopolar technique has still a place in TURP.
The Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) is a complex developmental disorder with multisystemic manifestations including supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS), a so-called elfin face, a hoarse voice, and a specific cognitive phenotype. Most WBS patients have a 41 Mb deletion on one of their chromosomes 7 in q11 but except for elastin, whose haploinsufficiency causes the cardiovascular malformations, it is unknown which genes in the deletion area contribute to the phenotype. We have investigated a family with a cytogenetically balanced translocation t(7;16)(q11.23;q13) in which affected individuals manifested a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes ranging from a hoarse voice as the only feature to the full WBS phenotype. Molecular cytogenetic and DNA sequence analyses of the translocation breakpoint showed that the cytogenetic rearrangement disrupts the elastin gene locus within intron 5 in the exact same manner in all translocation carriers. The recently described large inversion of the 7q11.23 region was not present in this family. Our data demonstrate that disruption of the elastin gene by a translocation breakpoint may cause classical WBS, atypical WBS, SVAS, or no recognisable phenotype, and provide a clear example for extensive phenotypic variability associated with a position effect in humans.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.