Background: Open fractures are debilitating injuries for athletes. No prior studies have investigated open fractures in National Football League (NFL) players. Purpose: To compare outcomes after open fracture in NFL players in terms of (1) time to return to sport (RTS), (2) postinjury career length and games played per season, (3) postinjury performance, and (4) postinjury performance compared with matched controls. Study Design: Retrospective comparative series; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Publicly available records were used to identify NFL players who had sustained an open fracture between 1970 and 2018. Controls were matched to injured players by age, experience, position, and preinjury performance. RTS was defined as playing in at least 1 NFL game after open fracture. Comparisons between injured and control players were made using the paired-samples Student t test. Results: Injuries in 37 players were analyzed (age, 27.2 ± 3.6 years; experience, 4.4 ± 3.6 seasons).  The 3 most common locations for open fracture were the tibia/fibula (n = 16), hand/finger (n = 12), and forearm/wrist (n = 3). A total of 30 (81%) players had a mean time of RTS of 9.3 ± 8.2 months after open fracture; of these players, 4 (13.3%) who sustained hand/finger open fracture did not undergo surgical treatment. There was no difference in postinjury career length or games played per season between control and injured players. Postinjury performance was similar to preinjury performance in injured players, and postinjury performance scores were similar between injured and control players. There were significant differences between players who sustained upper extremity and lower extremity open fractures in RTS time (4.0 ± 4.8 vs 14.6 ± 7.4 months, respectively; P = .00007) and postinjury performance (6.4 ± 4.3 vs 3.3 ± 2.1, respectively; P = .03). Conclusion: RTS after open fracture among NFL players was high. Players who sustained an open fracture had similar games played per season, career length, and performance compared with matched controls. Players who sustained an upper extremity open fracture had a faster RTS time, higher RTS rate, and improved postinjury performance compared with players who sustained a lower extremity open fracture.

Introduction: Perioperative hypothermia (PH) is common in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). A previous study at our institution identified the largest drop in core body temperature between preoperative holding and induction of anesthesia. This study evaluates the effect of preoperative warming measures on PH in TJA patients. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 672 patients undergoing TJA at our institution between April 1 and October 31, 2017. Under the new normothermia protocol, patients received warmed intravenous fluids and forced-air warming gowns in the preoperative holding area. Time and temperature data for the perioperative period were collected from the electronic health record. Chi-square and paired t-tests were used to compare between total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty patients and between new and old protocols. Results: In the new protocol, 173 of 672 (26%) patients were hypothermic at incision compared with 140 of 383 (37%) patients in the previous protocol (P < 0.05). The largest drop in core body temperature occurred between preoperative holding and induction of anesthesia. The duration of time from operating room entry to incision was less for normothermic than for hypothermic patients. The duration of hypothermia was similar between new and old protocols overall, but markedly fewer total hip arthroplasty patients remained hypothermic for the entire surgery under the new protocol. Conclusion: Adding forced-air warming preoperatively to our warming protocol reduced the rate of PH by approximately 30%. The time from entry into the operating room to the start of surgery should be minimized because patients are vulnerable to PH during this interval.

Introduction The purpose of this study was to review and compare clinical outcomes between percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) and collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injection for the treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture. Materials and Methods A systematic review was performed including all level I-III evidence studies investigating the clinical outcomes of PNF and CCH injection in the treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture. Results Five studies (278 CCH patients, 225 PNF patients; 285 CCH fingers, 246 PNF fingers, 405 males, and 98 females) were analyzed. Two randomized studies were level I evidence, one randomized study was level II, and two nonrandomized studies were level III. Two studies analyzed a total of 205 patients, each demonstrating statistically superior outcomes in one outcome measure (contracture improvement and Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) satisfaction subscore) with PNF, while the remaining three studies demonstrated no significant differences in outcomes between the two techniques. Three studies reported a statistically higher rate of minor complications (local pain, edema, ecchymosis, lymphadenopathy, pruritis) with CCH, while the remaining two studies demonstrated no significant difference in complication rates. Conclusion For the treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture, there is some evidence that suggests superior clinical outcomes of PNF compared with CCH and a higher minor complication rate with CCH.