High field 1H NMR spectroscopy was used for the rapid multicomponent analysis of low molecular wt compounds in urine in order to investigate the patterns of metabolic changes associated with early renal allograft dysfunction. Urine samples were collected daily for 14 days from 33 patients who underwent primary renal allograft transplantation, and analyzed by 500 and/or 600 MHz 1H NMR spectroscopy. All patients received 20 mg prednisolone and 5 mg/kg b.d. oral cyclosporin A (CsA) solution. In this study no patient showed clinical or histopathological evidence of CsA nephrotoxicity. For each patient the NMR-generated metabolite data were correlated with the clinical observations, graft biopsy pathology, and data from conventional laboratory techniques for assessing renal function. The NMR spectra of urine from patients with immediate functioning grafts were similar with respect to their patterns of amino acids, organic acids and organic amines, whereas the patients with delayed or non-functioning grafts showed significantly different metabolite excretion patterns. In longitudinal studies on individual patients there were increased urinary levels of trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), dimethylamine (DMA), lactate, acetate, succinate, glycine and alanine during episodes of graft dysfunction. However, only the urinary concentration of TMAO was statistically significantly higher (P < 0.025) in the urine collected from patients during episodes of graft dysfunction (410 +/- 102 microM TMAO/mM creatinine) than in patients with good graft function (91 +/- 18 microM TMAO/mM creatinine) or healthy control subjects (100 +/- 50 microM TMAO/mM creatinine). These findings suggest that graft dysfunction is associated with damage to the renal medulla which causes the release of TMAO into the urine from the damaged renal medullary cells. This provides a possible novel urinary marker for post-transplant graft dysfunction. This study shows that NMR spectroscopy of biofluids, when used in combination with conventional laboratory techniques, is a valuable aid to renal transplant monitoring.

It is possible to predict plasma concentrations of drugs by measurement in saliva, obviating the need for venipuncture. Using a selection of weakly acidic and basic drugs, we have found this prediction reliable for drugs largely nonionized at normal plasma pH (phenytoin, phenobarbital, antipyrine) but unreliable for ionized drugs (chlorpropramide, tolbutamide, propranolol, meperidine). Deliberate alteration of saliva flow rate and pH using different stimuli have produced twofold changes in saliva drug concentrations. Wide interindividual variability of saliva pH is the likely explanation for the inconstancy of saliva to plasma concentration ratios for ionized drugs.

The concentrations of lidocaine and of its deethylated metabolite, MEGX, were measured in blood following the intravenous administration of 50 and 100 mg lidocaine hydrochloride, the oral administration of 100, 300, and 500 mg lidocaine hydrochloride monohydrate, and the oral administration of 300 mg lidocaine hydrochloride monohydrate every 8 h for seven doses, to three healthy volunteers. The range of values for the parameters defining the disposition kinetics of lidocaine were: terminal half-life, 50-231 min; total clearance, 13-17 ml/min/kg; initial dilution space, 0.13-2.5 liters/kg; and volume of distribution at steady state, 0.6-4.5 liters/kg. Lidocaine absorption from solution was rapid, but due to presystemic hepatic metabolism, the availability was low, the range of average values lying between 0.19 and 0.38. No dose or time dependency in lidocaine and monoethylglycinexylidide pharmacokinetics following the single dose studies of lidocaine were noted. Effective hepatic blood flow, based on total clearance and availability measurements, was estimated to be 18-27 ml/min/kg. The concentrations of MEGX were approximately one-third of those of lidocaine following intravenous lidocaine and were comparable following oral lidocaine, but as predicted, the dose normalized area under the MEGX concentration-time curve was constant and independent of the route of administration of lidocaine. In two subjects, the blood concentrations of lidocaine and MEGX following multiple doses of oral lidocaine were those predicted from the single dose studies. In the third subject, the degree of accumulation of lidocaine was greater than predicted. The reasons and mechanism for this difference between subjects on multiple dosing remains unclear.