Regions of low oxygenation (hypoxia) are a characteristic feature of solid tumors, and cells existing in these regions are a major factor influencing radiation resistance as well as playing a significant role in malignant progression. Consequently, numerous pre-clinical and clinical attempts have been made to try and overcome this hypoxia. These approaches involve improving oxygen availability, radio-sensitizing or killing the hypoxic cells, or utilizing high LET (linear energy transfer) radiation leading to a lower OER (oxygen enhancement ratio). Interestingly, hyperthermia (heat treatments of 39–45 °C) induces many of these effects. Specifically, it increases blood flow thereby improving tissue oxygenation, radio-sensitizes via DNA repair inhibition, and can kill cells either directly or indirectly by causing vascular damage. Combining hyperthermia with low LET radiation can even result in anti-tumor effects equivalent to those seen with high LET. The various mechanisms depend on the time and sequence between radiation and hyperthermia, the heating temperature, and the time of heating. We will discuss the role these factors play in influencing the interaction between hyperthermia and radiation, and summarize the randomized clinical trials showing a benefit of such a combination as well as suggest the potential future clinical application of this combination.

Tumor hypoxia is a common feature of the microenvironment in solid tumors, primarily due to an inadequate, and heterogeneous vascular network. It is associated with resistance to radiotherapy and results in a poorer clinical outcome. The presence of hypoxia in tumors can be identified by various invasive and non-invasive techniques, and there are a number of approaches by which hypoxia can be modified to improve outcome. However, despite these factors and the ongoing extensive pre-clinical studies, the clinical focus on hypoxia is still to a large extent lacking. Hypoxia is a major cellular stress factor and affects a wide range of molecular pathways, and further understanding of the molecular processes involved may lead to greater clinical applicability of hypoxic modifiers. This review is a discussion of the characteristics of tumor hypoxia, hypoxia-related molecular pathways, and the role of hypoxia in treatment resistance. Understanding the molecular aspects of hypoxia will improve our ability to clinically monitor hypoxia and to predict and modify the therapeutic response.

No abstract

The interaction between 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) and radiation was investigated in two different mouse tumor models and a normal mouse tissue. C3H mouse mammary carcinomas transplanted in the feet of CDF1 mice and KHT mouse sarcomas growing in the leg muscles of C3H/HeJ mice were used. DMXAA was dissolved in saline and injected intraperitoneally. Tumors were irradiated locally in nonanesthetized mice, and response was assessed using tumor growth for the C3H mammary carcinoma and in vivo/in vitro clonogenic cell survival for the KHT sarcoma. DMXAA alone had an antitumor effect in both tumor types, but only at doses above 15 mg/kg. DMXAA also enhanced radiation damage, and again there was a threshold dose. No enhancement was seen in the C3H mammary carcinoma at 10 mg/kg and below, while in the KHT sarcoma, doses above 15 mg/kg were necessary. This enhancement of radiation damage was also dependent on the sequence of and interval between the treatments with DMXAA and radiation. Combining radiation with DMXAA at the maximum tolerated dose (i.e., the highest dose that could be injected without causing any lethality) of either 20 mg/kg (CDF1 mice) or 17.5 mg/kg (C3H/HeJ mice) gave an additive response when the two agents were administered simultaneously. Even greater antitumor effects were achieved when DMXAA was administered 1-3 h after irradiation. However, when administration of DMXAA preceded irradiation, the effect was similar to that seen for radiation alone, suggesting that appropriate timing is essential to maximize the utility of this agent. When such conditions were met, DMXAA was found to increase the tumor response significantly in the absence of an enhancement of radiation damage in normal skin, thus giving rise to therapeutic gain.