Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) deliver extracellular signals that govern many developmental and regenerative processes, but the mechanisms regulating FGF signaling remain incompletely understood. Here, we explored the relationship between intrinsic stability of FGF proteins and their biological activity for all 18 members of the FGF family. We report that FGF1, FGF3, FGF4, FGF6, FGF8, FGF9, FGF10, FGF16, FGF17, FGF18, FGF20, and FGF22 exist as unstable proteins, which are rapidly degraded in cell cultivation media. Biological activity of FGF1, FGF3, FGF4, FGF6, FGF8, FGF10, FGF16, FGF17, and FGF20 is limited by their instability, manifesting as failure to activate FGF receptor signal transduction over long periods of time, and influence specific cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. Stabilization via exogenous heparin binding, introduction of stabilizing mutations or lowering the cell cultivation temperature rescues signaling of unstable FGFs. Thus, the intrinsic ligand instability is an important elementary level of regulation in the FGF signaling system.

Recently, FGFR1 was found to be overexpressed in osteosarcoma and represents an important target for precision medicine. However, because targeted cancer therapy based on FGFR inhibitors has so far been less efficient than expected, a detailed understanding of the target is important. We have here applied proximity-dependent biotin labeling combined with label-free quantitative mass spectrometry to identify determinants of FGFR1 activity in an osteosarcoma cell line. Many known FGFR interactors were identified (e.g. FRS2, PLCG1, RSK2, SRC), but the data also suggested novel determinants. A strong hit in our screen was the tyrosine phosphatase PTPRG. We show that PTPRG and FGFR1 interact and colocalize at the plasma membrane where PTPRG directly dephosphorylates activated FGFR1. We further show that osteosarcoma cell lines depleted for PTPRG display increased FGFR activity and are hypersensitive to stimulation by FGF1. In addition, PTPRG depletion elevated cell growth and negatively affected the efficacy of FGFR kinase inhibitors. Thus, PTPRG may have future clinical relevance by being a predictor of outcome after FGFR inhibitor treatment.

FGF1 and FGF2 bind to specific cell-surface tyrosine kinase receptors (FGFRs) and activate intracellular signaling that leads to proliferation, migration or differentiation of many cell types. Besides this classical mode of action, under stress conditions, FGF1 and FGF2 are translocated in a receptor-dependent manner via the endosomal membrane into the cytosol and nucleus of the cell. However, despite many years of research, the role of translocated FGF1 and FGF2 inside the cell remains unclear. Here, we reveal an anti-apoptotic activity of intracellular FGF1 and FGF2, which is independent of FGFR activation and downstream signaling. We observed an inhibition of cell apoptosis induced by serum starvation or staurosporine upon treatment with exogenous FGF1 or FGF2, despite the presence of highly potent FGFR inhibitors. Similar results were found when the tyrosine kinase of FGFR1 was completely blocked by a specific mutation. Moreover, the anti-apoptotic effect of the growth factors was abolished by known inhibitors of the translocation of FGF1 and FGF2 from the endosomes to the interior of the cell. Interestingly, FGF2 showed higher anti-apoptotic activity than FGF1. Since FGF2 is not phosphorylated by PKCδ and is present inside the nucleus longer than is FGF1, we speculated that the different activities could reflect their diverse nuclear export kinetics. Indeed, we observed that FGF1 mutations preventing binding to nucleolin and therefore phosphorylation in the nucleus affect the anti-apoptotic activity of FGF1. Taken together, our data indicate that the translocation of FGF1 and FGF2 protects cells against apoptosis and promotes cell survival.