Purpose: Thus far, dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy of cancer was primarily based on in vitro-generated monocytederived DCs, which require extensive in vitro manipulation. Here, we report on a clinical study exploiting primary CD1c þ myeloid DCs, naturally circulating in the blood. Experimental Design: Fourteen stage IV melanoma patients, without previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease, received autologous CD1c þ myeloid DCs, activated by only brief (16 hours) ex vivo culture and loaded with tumor-associated antigens of tyrosinase and gp100. Results: Our results show that therapeutic vaccination against melanoma with small amounts (3-10 Â 10 6 ) of myeloid DCs is feasible and without substantial toxicity. Four of 14 patients showed long-term progression-free survival (12-35 months), which directly correlated with the development of multifunctional CD8þ T-cell responses in three of these patients. In particular, high CD107a expression, indicative for cytolytic activity, and IFNg as well as TNFa and CCL4 production was observed. Apparently, these T-cell responses are essential to induce tumor regression and promote long-term survival by stalling tumor growth. Conclusions:We show that vaccination of metastatic melanoma patients with primary myeloid DCs is feasible and safe and results in induction of effective antitumor immune responses that coincide with improved progression-free survival. Clin Cancer Res; 22(9); 2155-66. Ó2015 AACR.

Dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy is explored worldwide in cancer patients, predominantly with DC matured with pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandin E2. We studied the safety and efficacy of vaccination with monocyte-derived DC matured with a cocktail of prophylactic vaccines that contain clinical-grade Toll-like receptor ligands (BCG, Typhim, Act-HIB) and prostaglandin E2 (VAC-DC). Stage III and IV melanoma patients were vaccinated via intranodal injection (12 patients) or combined intradermal/intravenous injection (16 patients) with VAC-DC loaded with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and mRNA encoding tumor antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. Tumor antigen-specific T cell responses were monitored in blood and skin-test infiltrating-lymphocyte cultures. Almost all patients mounted prophylactic vaccine- or KLH-specific immune responses. Both after intranodal injection and after intradermal/intravenous injection, tumor antigen-specific immune responses were detected, which coincide with longer overall survival in stage IV melanoma patients. VAC-DC induce local and systemic CTC grade 2 and 3 toxicity, which is most likely caused by BCG in the maturation cocktail. The side effects were self-limiting or resolved upon a short period of systemic steroid therapy. We conclude that VAC-DC can induce functional tumor-specific responses. Unfortunately, toxicity observed after vaccination precludes the general application of VAC-DC, since in DC maturated with prophylactic vaccines BCG appears to be essential in the maturation cocktail.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00262-016-1796-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose: The tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib have efficacy in several types of cancer. Recent studies indicate that these agents affect the immune system. The way it affects the immune response to influenza vaccination is unknown. The aim of this study was to elucidate the specific immune response to seasonal flu vaccination in cancer patients treated with sunitinib or sorafenib.Patients and Methods: Sunitinib-or sorafenib-treated cancer patients were vaccinated against seasonal influenza with an inactivated vaccine. Healthy controls and patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) without systemic treatment (nontreated mRCC controls) were included for comparison. Antibody responses were measured at baseline, day 8, and day 22 by a standard hemagglutination inhibition assay and cellular T-cell responses at baseline and day 8 by proliferation assay and secretion of cytokines.Results: Forty subjects were enrolled: 16 patients treated with sunitinib, 6 patients with sorafenib, 7 nontreated mRCC controls, and 11 healthy controls. All patients treated with sunitinib and sorafenib developed seroprotection rates comparable with controls. Functional T-cell reactivity was observed in all groups, except for patients treated with sorafenib who showed a decreased proliferation rate and IFN-g/IL-2 production and increased IL-10 compared with healthy controls.Conclusion: We conclude that influenza vaccination should be recommended to cancer patients treated with sunitinib or sorafenib. Clin Cancer Res; 17(13); 4541-9. Ó2011 AACR.

Supplementary Figures S1-S3 from Cancer Patients Treated with Sunitinib or Sorafenib Have Sufficient Antibody and Cellular Immune Responses to Warrant Influenza Vaccination

<p>Supplementary Figure 3. KLH-specific immune responses before and after DC vaccination. (A) KLH-specific T cell proliferation was analyzed before the first vaccination and after each DC vaccination during the first vaccination cycle in peripheral blood of vaccinated metastatic melanoma patients. Per time point each dot represents 1 patient. Proliferative response to KLH is given as proliferation index (proliferation with KLH/proliferation without KLH). The two patients not showing a KLH-specific T cell response are shown in grey. (B) KLH-specific IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies were quantitatively measured after each vaccination cycle in sera of vaccinated patients. Per isotype each dot represents one patient. Best KLH responses per patient are shown.</p>