No abstract

Purpose The clinical outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) is heterogeneous. A simple and reliable tool is needed to stratify MM patients. We combined the International Staging System (ISS) with chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (iFISH) after CD138 plasma cells purification and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to evaluate their prognostic value in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Methods Clinical and laboratory data from 4445 NDMM patients enrolled in eleven international trials were pooled together. The K-adaptive partitioning algorithm was used to define the most appropriate subgroups with homogeneous survival. Results ISS, CA, and LDH data were simultaneously available in 3060/4445 patients. We defined three groups: revised ISS (R-ISS) I (N=871), including ISS I (serum β2-microglobulin level <3.5mg/L and serum albumin level ≥3.5g/dL), no high-risk CA [del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16)] and normal LDH level (below the upper limit of normal range); R-ISS III (N=295), including ISS III (serum β2-microglobulin level >5.5mg/L) and high-risk CA or high LDH level; R-ISS II (N=1894), including all the other possible combinations. At a median follow-up of 46 months, the 5-year OS was 82% in the R-ISS I, 62% in the R-ISS II, and 40% in the R-ISS III groups; the 5-year PFS was 55%, 36% and 24%, respectively. Conclusions The R-ISS is a simple and powerful prognostic staging system and we recommend its use in future clinical studies to stratify NDMM patients effectively with respect to the relative risk to their survival.

Multiple myeloma is an incurable plasma cell malignancy with a complex and incompletely understood molecular pathogenesis. Here we use whole-exome sequencing, copy-number profiling and cytogenetics to analyse 84 myeloma samples. Most cases have a complex subclonal structure and show clusters of subclonal variants, including subclonal driver mutations. Serial sampling reveals diverse patterns of clonal evolution, including linear evolution, differential clonal response and branching evolution. Diverse processes contribute to the mutational repertoire, including kataegis and somatic hypermutation, and their relative contribution changes over time. We find heterogeneity of mutational spectrum across samples, with few recurrent genes. We identify new candidate genes, including truncations of SP140, LTB, ROBO1 and clustered missense mutations in EGR1. The myeloma genome is heterogeneous across the cohort, and exhibits diversity in clonal admixture and in dynamics of evolution, which may impact prognostic stratification, therapeutic approaches and assessment of disease response to treatment.

Lenalidomide maintenance after transplantation significantly prolonged progression-free and event-free survival among patients with multiple myeloma. Four years after randomization, overall survival was similar in the two study groups. (Funded by the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00430365.).

BACKGROUND High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation has been the standard treatment for young patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. However, promising emerging data with the combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (RVD) have raised questions about the role of transplantation. METHODS We randomly assigned 700 patients to the RVD group (eight cycles; 350 patients) or to the transplant group (three cycles of RVD, followed by high-dose melphalan plus stem cell transplantation, followed by two additional cycles of RVD; 350 patients). Patients in both arms received maintenance lenalidomide for 1 year. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the transplant versus the RVD group (median, 50 months vs. 36 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; P<0.001). This benefit was observed across all patient subgroups, including those stratified by International Staging System stage and cytogenetic risk profile. Transplantation versus RVD alone was associated with increased complete response (59% vs. 48%; P=0.006), and minimal residual disease negativity (79% vs. 65%; P<0.001). Overall survival was similar in both arms (4-year survival, 81% in the transplant group vs. 82% in the RVD group). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was significantly more common with transplantation than with RVD (92% vs. 47%), as were gastrointestinal adverse events (28% vs. 7%) and infections (20% vs. 9%). Rates of treatment-related deaths, second primary malignancies, thromboembolic events, and peripheral neuropathy were similar in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS RVD plus transplant significantly prolonged progression-free survival as compared with RVD alone without overall survival difference.