This study was done to understand the different available methods used to calculate colorectal transit times. A single abdominal radiograph is taken following six successive daily ingestions of the same number of identical radiopaque markers. This method correlates well (P less than 0.001) with that using a single ingestion of markers with daily x-ray films until total expulsion. In techniques used to measure colorectal transit time with multiple ingestion of markers, the number of days of ingestion depends on the kinetics of marker defecation. This was found to differ markedly in various groups of control subjects and constipated patients (P less than 0.001) and can be used to obtain reliable data, even in subjects with severe constipation. When they ingest 20 markers, constipated patients are found to retain eight or more markers three days after ingestion, and taking a plain film of the abdomen on that day is sufficient to make a diagnosis of constipation. Transit time studies are reproducible from month to month in patients with an irritable bowel syndrome. Control subjects who claim that their bowel habits are not modified by stress have shorter transit times, similar in both sexes, than those who say they are (P less than 0.001). This may explain why a large percentage of constipated patients have been found by most authors to have "normal" colorectal transit times. The choice of control subjects is thus a key element in studies of functional bowel motor disorders. Stool frequency and consistency, in health, correlate only to rectosigmoid transit time.

No abstract

This study suggests an association between UPF and IBS. Further longitudinal studies are needed to confirm those results and understand the relative impact of the nutritional composition and specific characteristics of UPF in this relationship.

OBJECTIVES:Prucalopride is effective at alleviating symptoms of chronic constipation in women. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of 12 weeks of prucalopride treatment compared with placebo in men with chronic constipation.METHODS:This was a multicenter, stratified, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01147926). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a mean of three or more spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBMs) per week across the treatment period. Efficacy end points were assessed using daily electronic diaries, global assessment of the severity of constipation and efficacy of treatment, and Patient Assessment of Constipation—Symptoms (PAC-SYM) and Patient Assessment of Constipation—Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaires.RESULTS:In total, 374 patients were enrolled in the study. Significantly more patients achieved a mean of three or more SCBMs per week in the prucalopride group (37.9%) than in the placebo group (17.7%, P<0.0001). The proportion of patients rating their constipation treatment as “quite a bit” to “extremely” effective at the final on-treatment visit was 46.7 and 30.4% in the prucalopride and placebo groups, respectively. The difference between treatment groups was statistically significant (P<0.0001). The proportion of patients with an improvement of at least 1 point in PAC-QOL satisfaction subscale score was 52.7 and 38.8% in the prucalopride and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.0035). Prucalopride had a good safety profile and was well tolerated.CONCLUSIONS:Prucalopride is effective, has a good safety profile, and is well tolerated for the treatment of men with chronic constipation.