Intermittent hypoxia induces sequential cardiovascular events suggesting increased chemoreflex and depressed baroreflex, resulting in sympathoadrenal hyperactivity, early hemodynamic alterations with proximal histologic remodeling, and delayed changes in peripheral vasoreactivity. Such early alterations before overt cardiovascular disease strengthen the need for identifying at-risk individuals for systematic treatment.

While the placebo effect has been studied for a long time, much less is known about its negative counterpart, named the nocebo effect. However, it may be of particular importance because of its impact on the treatment outcomes and public health. We conducted a review on the nocebo effect using PubMed and other databases up to July 2014. The nocebo effect refers by definition to the induction or the worsening of symptoms induced by sham or active therapies. Examples are numerous and concerns both clinical trials and daily practice. The underlying mechanisms are, on one hand, psychological (conditioning and negative expectations) and, on the other hand, neurobiological (role of cholecystokinin, endogenous opioids and dopamine). Nocebo effects can modulate the outcome of a given therapy in a negative way, as do placebo effects in a positive way. The verbal and nonverbal communications of physicians contain numerous unintentional negative suggestions that may trigger a nocebo response. This raises the important issue of how physicians can at the same time obtain informed consent and minimize nocebo‐related risks. Every physician has to deal with this apparent contradiction between primum non nocere and to deliver truthful information about risks. Meticulous identification of patients at risk, information techniques such as positive framing, contextualized informed consent, and even noninformation, is valuable.

Dextromethorphan (DM), a widely used and well-tolerated centrally acting antitussive, has been tested in several clinical trials for its antiepileptic and neuroprotective properties. However, the use of DM in these new clinical indications requires higher doses than antitussive doses, which may therefore induce phencyclidine (PCP)-like side-effects (memory and psychotomimetic disturbances) through its metabolic conversion to the active metabolite dextrorphan (DX), a more potent PCP-like non-competitive antagonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor than DM. Thus, we compared the behavioural effects in rats of intraperitoneal administration of DM and DX on motor activity in an open field and on learning and memory in the Morris water maze. DM (20, 30, 40 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent decrease in both locomotion and stereotyped behaviour with a slight ataxia for the highest dose. DX (20, 30, 40 mg/kg) induced a dose-dependent increase in locomotion and stereotypies (swaying, turning) with moderate ataxia. Assessments of learning and memory were performed with lower doses of DM (10, 20, 30 mg/kg) and DX (5, 10, 15 mg/kg) because of motivational deficits (40 mg/kg of DM, 20-40 mg/kg of DX) and motor disorders (30, 40 mg/kg of DX) in the cue learning procedure. DX (10, 15 mg/kg) impaired spatial learning with a long-lasting effect for the highest dose whereas 5 mg/kg of DX and DM (10-30 mg/kg) did not. Only 15 mg/kg of DX appeared to slightly impair working memory. DM (10-30 mg/kg) and DX (5-15 mg/kg) did not impair reference memory. Thus, the two antitussives DM and DX induced different behavioural effects suggesting sedative effects for DM and PCP-like effects for DX. However, PCP-like side-effects with DM remain possible through its metabolic conversion to DX, with very high doses and/or in extensive metabolizers and/or in aged subjects prone to cognitive dysfunction. Therefore, the identification of DM metabolism phenotype, an adapted prescription and a pharmacological modulation of the DM metabolism may avoid adverse effects.

No abstract