Endoscopic transaxillary breast augmentation makes it possible to treat the same deformities, with the same refinements, as the more traditional approaches. The absence of scar in the breast aesthetic unit explains patients' interest in this operation. The technique has withstood the test of time. It has been found to be safe, has a relatively easy learning curve, and produces consistent results.

Background:Multicenter prospective studies assessing the safety and efficacy of silicone gel breast implants are relatively rare. Eurosilicone S.A.S. present their safety and efficacy data herein for the largest European silicone gel breast implant study published to date.Methods:One thousand and ten of Eurosilicone’s textured cohesive Cristalline Paragel range of mammary implants was implanted in women undergoing augmentation and reconstructive surgery at 17 centers throughout France. Physical examinations and complications were recorded by physicians at 3 months and annually thereafter until 10 years postimplantation. Descriptive statistics were used and key complications were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis method.Results:Two ruptures were observed within 5 years postimplantation, one of which was subject to mechanical trauma during reoperation and the other was identified during routine screening. Capsular contracture, one of the most common complications associated with breast implants, was reported in 6.6% implants across all indications through 5 years. The Kaplan-Meier risk of capsular contracture (Baker III/IV) was 10.7% (95% confidence interval, 7.2–14.2%) and 17.2% (95% confidence interval, 5.4–29%) in the primary augmentation and primary reconstruction patient cohorts, respectively. Implant removal (explantation/exchange) was 8.5% and 16.5% for primary augmentation and primary reconstruction cohorts, respectively. Rates of local complications including infection and seroma were low with risk rates of 0.6% and 0.2% by subject.Conclusions:Eurosilicone S.A.S. prospective study involving 1010 Eurosilicone silicone gel breast implants in both round and shaped profiles demonstrated a low rupture rate and an excellent safety profile through 5 years.

The authors report the results of a multicenter prospective study evaluating a novel technology: dermal suture using absorbable staples composed of polylactic and polyglycolic acids. From January to June 2009, 59 dermal sutures were performed with Insorb absorbable staples and 41 with absorbable thread. All patients in the study underwent abdominal dermolipectomy (N = 65) or surgery for breast hypertrophy (N = 35). The purpose of the study was to compare the closure time and healing quality obtained with the 2 methods. Ninety-five patients were reexamined by the surgeon after 1 year of follow-up to assess scar width, suppleness, inflammation, and hypertrophy. The overall results were good and quite similar for the 2 groups. Thus, the use of Insorb staples reduced closure time while ensuring good healing quality.

The aim of this paper is to summarize the results of a consensus process and a European webinar of the two societies, European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Surgery (EASAPS) and the European Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Societies (ESPRAS) on what is considered safe practice based on the scientific knowledge we have today. This review of the current situations gives considerations which have to be taken into account when getting back to work in plastic surgery with COVID-19 in Europe. At all times, one should be familiar the local and regional infection rates in the community, with particular emphasis on the emergence of second and third waves of the pandemic. Due to the fast-evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic the recommendations aim to be rather considerations than fixed guidelines and might need to be revised in near future.

Background A growing body of evidence indicates that breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is associated with the use of certain breast implants. Regional variations have been reported, and a genetic susceptibility has also been suggested. However, large variations in the ability to correctly diagnose BIA-ALCL and to further report and register cases exist between countries and may in part explain variations in the demography. Material and Methods A survey was conducted by The European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery E(A)SAPS and sent to 48 European countries. The primary aim was to identify the total number of confirmed cases of and deaths from BIA-ALCL in each country during four consecutive measurements over a two-year period. Results An increase in BIA-ALCL cases during four repeated measurements from a total of 305 in April 2019 to 434 in November 2020 was reported by 23 of the 33 responding countries. A nearly 100-fold variation in the number of cases per million inhabitants was noted, where Netherlands had the highest rate (4.12) followed by Finland (1.99). Countries with the lowest reported rates were Austria (0.078), Romania (0.052) and Turkey (0.048). Conclusion The current study displays a notable variation ßin the number of confirmed BIA-ALCL cases across Europe, even for countries with established breast implant registers. Variations in diagnosis and reporting systems may explain the differences, but the influence of genetic variations and the prevalence of high-risk implants cannot be excluded. Incomplete sales data along with medical tourism preclude an absolute risk assessment. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.