Using univariate analysis, the authors determined prognostic factors that were significantly associated with a favorable impact on survival including age younger than 60 years, radiation therapy (without evidence of a dose-response relationship), radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy, and chemotherapy consisting of anthracycline. Partial surgical resection was an unfavorable prognostic factor. Multivariate analysis was used to confirm the independent prognostic value of radiation therapy, age, chemotherapy consisting of anthracyclines or methotrexate, and partial surgical resection. This European survey provides a reasonable basis for the treatment of primary intracerebral lymphoma with the following sequence: stereotactic biopsy sampling, chemotherapy with a methotrexate- and anthracycline-based regimen, followed by cranial irradiation.
BACKGROUND: There is a strong need to determine the best technique for O 6 -methylguanine-DNA-methyltranferase (MGMT) analysis, because MGMT status is currently used in clinical trials and occasionally in routine clinical practice for glioblastoma patients. METHODS:The authors compared analytical performances and predictive values of 5 techniques in a series of 100 glioblastoma patients who received standard of care treatment (Stupp protocol). RESULTS: MGMT promoter was considered methylated in 33%, 33%, 42%, and 60% of patients by methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting, MethyLight, pyrosequencing (with an optimal risk cutoff at 8% for the average percentage of the 5 CpGs tested), and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR), respectively. Fifty-nine percent of the samples had <23% (the optimal risk cutoff) of MGMT-positive tumor cells. The best predictive values for overall survival (OS), after adjustment for age and performance status, were obtained by pyrosequencing (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; P < .0001), MS-PCR (HR, 0.37; P < .0001), and immunohistochemistry (HR, 0.43; P ¼ .0005) as compared with methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (HR, 0.52 P ¼ .02) and MethyLight (HR, 0.6; P ¼ .05). For progression-free survival (PFS), the best predictive values were obtained with pyrosequencing (HR, 0.35; P < .0001), methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (HR, 0.46; P ¼ .002), and MS-PCR (HR, 0.49; P ¼ .002). Combining pyrosequencing and immunohistochemistry slightly improved predictive power for OS, but not for PFS. Poor reproducibility and interobserver variability were, however, observed for immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: Good prediction of survival in addition to high reproducibility and sensitivity made pyrosequencing the best among the 5 techniques tested in this study. Cancer 2012;118:4201-11.
This multicenter study assesses the value of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status for predicting overall survival in glioblastoma patients. Five methods are used, to identify the approach with the best prognostic value. Eighty-one tumors were obtained from patients with glioblastomas treated by surgery and radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) followed by adjuvant TMZ. MGMT promoter methylation was assessed by qualitative methyl-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP), semiquantitative methyl-specific polymerase chain reaction (SQ-MSP), and pyrosequencing, while MGMT expression was measured at the RNA level by quantitative real-time PCR (Q-RT-PCR) and at the protein level by immunohistochemistry (IHC). MGMT promoter methylation as evaluated by MSP, SQ-MSP, and pyrosequencing was significantly correlated with overall survival. The best predictive value was obtained by pyrosequencing of one specific CpG position. Overall survival was 14 and 25 months for patients with percentages of methylation below and above the median, respectively. In contrast, MGMT status determined by Q-RT-PCR and IHC showed little or no correlation with overall survival, respectively. These results confirm the prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients initially treated with TMZ. SQ-MSP allowed better discrimination than classical MSP, and pyrosequencing represented a good option.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.