MS clinical features vary between patients. In approximately 60% of cases, cognitive deficits are associated with motor disabilities, with consequences on both walking and maintaining balance and cognitive efficiency. Multimodal programs are very infrequent for MS patients and cognitive rehabilitation is not provided by the Italian health system, which only favors access to motor rehabilitation. Dual-task studies showed how motor and cognitive skills are closely associated. Therefore, physiotherapy exercises may favor an indirect improvement in cognition. The aim of this study is to understand which rehabilitative approach may increase both cognitive and motor efficiency, avoiding the waste of time and resources. In this multi-site single-blind parallel controlled clinical trial, we will compare three rehabilitative approaches: cognitive training, motor training and combined cognitive–motor training. We also aim to evaluate: whether self-perception and objective improvement correspond; the impact of each rehabilitation program on patients’ QoL, mood and self-perception; and long-term effects. A total of 60 patients will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatments for two 45-min sessions/week for 12 weeks. All participants will undergo a complete cognitive, motor, clinical assessment together with mood, self-perception, and QoL questionnaires before, immediately after and 6 months after the training period.

Cognitive impairment (CI) represents a common symptom in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS), which can affect every stage of the disease course. Recent studies seem to support cognitive rehabilitation (CR) for minimizing the CI consequences. We reviewed the currently available evidence on the non-pharmacological approaches to CI, with the aim of giving an overview of the treatments used worldwide, from the traditional methods to the most recent techniques. A search of the literature was conducted on PubMed (articles in English performed in the last five years on humans). A total of 37 articles met our eligibility criteria after screening titles, abstracts and full-text and were divided into three main groups: in-presence interventions; studies performed via tele-rehabilitation and miscellaneous. Despite the great heterogeneity of the intervention and assessment methods, the evidence suggests that a non-pharmacological approach can improve MS-related CI. Cognitive rehabilitation seems effective and well established, as well as the use of computerized CR having the benefit of being even more appealing. Limited conclusions can be drawn on group CR due to the small number of studies focused on this kind of intervention. Some of the innovative approaches (virtual reality, EEG-based neurofeedback, brain stimulation, exercise, diet modification) may play a role in future studies and should be deeply explored.

Background At the moment, the possible options for the management of cognitive dysfunctions in patients with MS (pMS) are pharmacological interventions, cognitive rehabilitation (CR), and physical exercise. However, worldwide, multimodal programs are infrequently applied in pMS and CR is not easily accessible through the National Health System as MR. Objective The aim of the study is to explore if the combination of motor and cognitive rehabilitation may favor better outcomes on cognitive efficiency compared to separate trainings. Methods Forty-eight pMS were submitted to detailed neuropsychological and motor assessments, before (T0) and after (T1) having performed one of three rehabilitation conditions (two cognitive trainings/week-Reha1; one cognitive and one motor training/week-Reha2; two motor trainings/week-Reha3, for 12 weeks); they were randomly assigned to one condition or another. The CR was focused on memory functioning and performed with the Rehacom program. Results No significant differences in age, sex, education, and disease course were found between the three groups (sig. > .05). Reha1 patients increased only their cognitive performance, and Reha3 only increased their motor performance, while Reha2 increased both cognitive and motor performances. This benefit was also confirmed by the cognitive efficiency expressed by the Cognitive Impairment Index. Conclusions These data confirm that to include cognitive training within rehabilitation programs may induce important benefits in pMS. Furthermore, pMS seem to benefit from a combined approach (cognitive and motor) more than from CR and motor rehabilitation separately (ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT05462678; 14 July 2022, retrospectively registered).

No abstract

No abstract