No abstract

Recent cases involving ethical scandals on the juvenile court bench have caught the interest of legal scholars, judges, practitioners, and the public. This article proposes a new theoretical framework for assessing these problems and articulates a series of vital ethical reforms. Despite their distinct role in an atypical court, juvenile court judges are not subject to unique ethical standards. Most jurisdictions have adopted the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct as the ethical code guiding juvenile court judges. However, this Model Code, intended to apply to any person in a decision-making capacity, was created for a more conventional type of judging than is expected from a juvenile court judge. Because these standards do not address the exceptional roles and challenges facing juvenile court judges, the potential for ethical violations and injustice is significant. This article therefore recommends innovative textual revisions designed to provide much-needed ethical guidance to juvenile court judges in three critical areas: (1) ex parte communications; (2) competence; and (3) demeanor and decorum. The implementation of ethical guidelines tailored for this specialized court will remedy an existing flaw in the scheme of judicial ethics, while reinforcing judges' abilities to determine the best outcomes for troubled youth.

No abstract

Juvenile court is designed to be more rehabilitative and less punitive than adult court, and juvenile court judges play different roles than their adult criminal court counterparts. Juvenile court judges are expected to perform judicial, administrative, and advocacy functions, while also serving as community educators informing the public about the challenges facing juvenile court and its young litigants. Judges can be elected or appointed, depending on the jurisdiction, but all juvenile courts demand a high level of training and expertise for judges. Challenges facing judges in these specialized courts include significant lack of resources, increasing administrative obligations, and the absence of a uniform ethical code of conduct specifically designed to meet the multidimensional roles of juvenile court judges.

No abstract