Among patients undergoing resection of stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV melanoma, adjuvant therapy with nivolumab resulted in significantly longer recurrence-free survival and a lower rate of grade 3 or 4 adverse events than adjuvant therapy with ipilimumab. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 238 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02388906 ; Eudra-CT number, 2014-002351-26 .).

Summary Background Dabrafenib plus trametinib (D+T) improves outcomes in BRAF V600–mutant metastatic melanoma without brain metastases; however, activity of D+T has not been studied in active melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Here, we report results from the phase 2 trial COMBI-MB. Our aim was to build upon the current body of evidence of targeted therapy in melanoma brain metastases through an evaluation of D+T in patients with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma brain metastases. Methods This ongoing open-label, phase 2 study (NCT02039947) evaluated dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily in four melanoma patient cohorts: (A) BRAF V600E, asymptomatic MBM, no prior local brain therapy; (B) BRAF V600E, asymptomatic MBM, prior local brain therapy; (C) BRAF V600D/K/R, asymptomatic MBM, with or without prior local brain therapy; and (D) BRAF V600D/E/K/R, symptomatic MBM, with or without prior local brain therapy. The primary objective was to assess intracranial response rate (IRR) in cohort A in the all-treated-subjects population. Secondary endpoints included IRR in cohorts B–D; extracranial and overall response rates; disease control rates; duration of intracranial, extracranial, and overall response; progression-free survival; overall survival; and safety. Findings A total of 125 patients were enrolled (A: n=76; B: n=16; C: n=16; D: n=17). At the data cutoff (November 28, 2016; median follow-up 8·5 months) investigator-assessed IRR was 58% (n=44/76) in cohort A. Intracranial response by investigator assessment was also achieved in 9 (56%) of 16 patients in cohort B, 7 (44%) of 16 patients in cohort C, and 10 (59%) of 17 patients in cohort D. Safety results were consistent with prior D+T studies, with 60 (48%) of 125 patients across cohorts experiencing grade 3/4 adverse events. The most common serious adverse events across cohorts were pyrexia (n=9/125; 7%) and ejection fraction decreased (n=5/125; 4%). Interpretation D+T was active with a manageable safety profile in patients with BRAF V600–mutant MBMs, but the median duration of response was relatively short. These results provide evidence of clinical benefit with D+T and support the need for additional research to further improve outcomes in patients with MBMs. Funding Novartis.

) is a heterodimeric protein, first recovered from EBV-transformed B cell lines.It is a multifunctional cytokine, the properties of which bridge innate and adaptive immunity, acting as a key regulator of cell-mediated immune responses through the induction of T helper 1 differentiation. By promoting IFN-g production, proliferation, and cytolytic activity of natural killer and T cells, IL-12 induces cellular immunity. In addition, IL-12 induces an antiangiogenic program mediated by IFN-g^inducible genes and by lymphocyte-endothelial cell cross-talk. The immunomodulating and antiangiogenic functions of IL-12 have provided the rationale for exploiting this cytokine as an anticancer agent. In contrast with the significant antitumor and antimetastatic activity of IL-12, documented in several preclinical studies, clinical trials with IL-12, used as a single agent, or as a vaccine adjuvant, have shown limited efficacy in most instances. More effective application of this cytokine, and of newly identified IL-12 family members (IL-23 and IL-27), should be evaluated as therapeutic agents with considerable potential in cancer patients.Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is recognized as a master regulator of adaptive type 1, cell-mediated immunity, the critical pathway involved in protection against neoplasia and many viruses. This is supported by the analysis of numerous animal (1, 2) and human clinical studies that attribute improved clinical outcome (3) and mechanisms of IL-12 -based therapy (4) to strong type 1 responses in situ. Since the initial preclinical and clinical studies of IL-12, done over a decade ago, basic and translational science studies have contributed to the greater understanding of IL-12 immunobiology. In addition to its noted effects in the priming of T helper 1 (TH1) cell responses and IFN-g production by T and natural killer (NK) cells, more recent studies support its critical role as a third signal for CD8 + T cell differentiation (5, 6), and its ability to serve as an important factor in the reactivation and survival of memory CD4 + T cells (7). This is particularly relevant in the repolarization of CD4 + T cells from dysfunctional antitumor TH2 into TH1 cells in the cancer setting (8). Here, we review the immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic functions of IL-12, as well as the results of preclinical and clinical studies in which IL-12 was used as an anticancer agent.

No abstract

No abstract