Our eyes are constantly in motion. Even during visual fixation, small eye movements continually jitter the location of gaze. It is known that visual percepts tend to fade when retinal image motion is eliminated in the laboratory. However, it has long been debated whether, during natural viewing, fixational eye movements have functions in addition to preventing the visual scene from fading. In this study, we analysed the influence in humans of fixational eye movements on the discrimination of gratings masked by noise that has a power spectrum similar to that of natural images. Using a new method of retinal image stabilization, we selectively eliminated the motion of the retinal image that normally occurs during the intersaccadic intervals of visual fixation. Here we show that fixational eye movements improve discrimination of high spatial frequency stimuli, but not of low spatial frequency stimuli. This improvement originates from the temporal modulations introduced by fixational eye movements in the visual input to the retina, which emphasize the high spatial frequency harmonics of the stimulus. In a natural visual world dominated by low spatial frequencies, fixational eye movements appear to constitute an effective sampling strategy by which the visual system enhances the processing of spatial detail.

No abstract

Summary Humans and other species continually perform microscopic eye movements, even when attending to a single point [1-3]. These movements, which include microscopic drifts and microsaccades, are under control of the oculomotor system [2, 4, 5], elicit strong responses throughout the visual system [6-11], and have been thought to serve important functions [12-16]. The influence of these fixational eye movements on the acquisition and neural processing of visual information remains unknown. Here, we show that during viewing of natural scenes, microscopic eye movements carry out a crucial information-processing step: they remove predictable correlations in natural scenes by equalizing the spatial power of the retinal image within the frequency range of ganglion cells' peak sensitivity. This transformation, which had been attributed to center-surround receptive field organization [17-19], occurs prior to any neural processing, and reveals a form of matching between the statistics of natural images and those of normal eye movements. We further show that the combined effect of microscopic eye movements and retinal receptive field organization is to convert spatial luminance discontinuities into synchronous firing events, thus beginning the process of edge extraction. In sum, our results show that microscopic eye movements are fundamental to two goals of early visual processing —redundancy reduction [20, 21] and feature extraction— and, thus, that neural representations are intrinsically sensory-motor from the very first processing stages.

How is space represented in the visual system? At first glance, the answer to this fundamental question appears straightforward: spatial information is directly encoded in the locations of neurons within maps. This concept has long dominated visual neuroscience, leading to mainstream theories of how neurons encode information. However, an accumulation of evidence indicates that this purely spatial view is incomplete, and that even for static images, the representation is fundamentally spatiotemporal. The evidence for this new understanding centers on recent experimental findings concerning the functional role of fixational eye movements, the tiny movements humans and other species continually perform, even when attending to a single point. Here, we review some of these findings and discuss their functional implications.

During visual fixation, microscopic eye movements shift the image on the retina over a large number of photoreceptors. Although these movements have been investigated for almost a century, the amount of retinal image motion they create remains unclear. Currently available estimates rely on assumptions about the probability distributions of eye movements that have never been tested. Furthermore, these estimates were based on data collected with only a few, highly experienced and motivated observers and may not be representative of the instability of naive and inexperienced subjects in experiments that require steady fixation. In this study, we used a high-resolution eye-tracker to estimate the probability distributions of gaze position in a relatively large group of human observers, most of whom were untrained, while they were asked to maintain fixation at the center of a uniform field in the presence/absence of a fixation marker. In all subjects, the probability distribution of gaze position deviated from normality, the underlying assumption of most previous studies. The resulting fixational dispersion of gaze was much larger than previously reported and varied greatly across individuals. Unexpectedly, the precision by which different observers maintained fixation on the marker was best predicted by the properties of ocular drift rather than those of microsaccades. Our results show that, during fixation, the eyes move by larger amounts and at higher speeds than commonly assumed and highlight the importance of ocular drift in maintaining accurate fixation.