Kim has received travel accommodations from and/or had expenses paid by Daiichi Sankyo and Amgen; and D.-W.K.'s institution has received research funding from Alpha Biopharma,

We have developed a screening methodology that analyzes the epigenome and informatically identifies candidate genes followed by in vitro culture screening of the candidate genes. To validate our screening methodology we further characterized one candidate gene, DOK2, and showed that loss of DOK2 induces chemotherapy resistance by decreasing the level of apoptosis in response to treatment.

9010 Background: Treatment options are limited for EGFRm NSCLC resistant to EGFR TKIs. HER3 is expressed in a majority of NSCLC tumors. U3-1402 is a HER3-targeted antibody drug conjugate with a fully human HER3-targeted antibody, novel cleavable peptide-based linker, and topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Methods: An ongoing multicenter phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study is assessing U3-1402 safety/tolerability and preliminary activity in metastatic or unresectable EGFRm NSCLC patients (pts) who are T790M negative after disease progression while on erlotinib, gefitinib or afatinib; or develop disease progression while on osimertinib regardless of T790M status. Dose escalation is based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and guided by the modified Continuous Reassessment Method. U3-1402 is administered via intravenous infusion in 21-day cycles. Pretreatment tumor tissue is required. Results: As of 11 Nov 2018, 15 pts (6 M; 9 F) were enrolled across 3 dose levels (3.2, 4.8, 6.4 mg/kg). Median age was 63 y; 10 pts had EGFR exon 19 deletion and 5 EGFR L858R mutation. Median sum of longest diameters (SLD) at baseline was 69 (range 22–143) mm. All pts had prior EGFR TKIs; 14 had 2nd line or later osimertinib. Six had prior chemotherapy. All 11 evaluable tumors demonstrated HER3 expression (median HER3 membrane H-score 188, range 150–290). Five pts discontinued treatment: 4 due to progressive disease, 1 due to adverse event (AE). All Grade (Gr) treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) in ≥20% of pts were nausea (60%), vomiting (40%), fatigue (33%), decreased appetite (27%), and alopecia (20%). Gr≥3 TEAEs were nausea (1/15; Gr3; related), hypoxia (1/15; Gr3; unrelated), and platelet count decreased (2/15; both Gr4 at 6.4 mg/kg and considered DLTs). In 13 evaluable pts, all but 1 had a decrease in SLD (median best change −29%, range +10% to −67%), 2 had confirmed partial response per RECIST v1.1 (best changes −44%, −67%). Conclusions: U3-1402 showed a manageable safety profile and preliminary antitumor activity in EGFR TKI-resistant EGFRm NSCLC. Evaluation of candidate biomarkers, including HER3 expression, which correlate with U3-1402 response is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03260491.

No abstract

7% Other. 1683 (66%) chose the requesting/treating track (50% government, 42% academic, 8% other). 61% reported most patients in their country do not receive molecular testing, with the lowest rates in Latin America/Other (p<0.0001). 39% were not satisfied with the conditions of molecular testing in their country. Indications for requesting testing included: adenocarcinoma (89%), never-smoker (61%), female (57%), and young (54%) (variable by region, p<0.0001). 99% ordered EGFR, 95% ALK, 84% PDL1, 79% ROS1, all other tests <50%. 56% typically received results within 10 days. Only 67% were aware of CAP/IASLC/AMP guidelines, least frequently in Asia/Other (p¼0.041). 37% have trouble understanding molecular testing result reports, most of whom cited a need for more technical and scientific knowledge. 75% had multidisciplinary tumor boards, but 23% met <1/ month. The 316 (12%) testing track respondents were from laboratories that were 49% academic, 35% government, and 16% private/ other. 94% of laboratories offered EGFR, 83% ALK, 69% KRAS, 68% BRAF, 64% ROS1, 56% HER2, and others <50%; 68% tested for PDL1. 57% offered Multiplex assays, less frequently in Latin America/Asia (p¼0.0294). 69% tested blood-derived DNA, less frequently in US/ Canada/Other (0.0013). 23% of respondents reported >10% of cases are rejected due to inadequate samples; however, 47% stated there is no policy or strategy to improve the quality of the tissue samples in their country. 52% reported patients/physicians are not satisfied with the state of molecular testing in their country. Respondents performing/interpreting assays (334, 14%) were typically informed of biopsy results (91%) and notified when the sample was inadequate (84%). The most frequent barrier to molecular testing in every region was cost, followed by quality/standards, turnaround-time, access, and awareness. After cost, time was the most common barrier in developed countries, while it was quality in developing countries. The second largest barrier was quality in Asia, access in Europe/Latin America/ Other, and turn-around time in US/Canada. Conclusion: These preliminary analyses show molecular testing usage varies across the globe. Barriers vary by region, and one-third of respondents were unaware of evidence-based guidelines. Global and regional strategies should be developed to address barriers.