ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the effects of two different perfusion
techniques: conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and miniature
cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing cardiac surgery at the
University Hospital of Santa Maria - RS.MethodsWe perform a retrospective, cross-sectional study, based on data collected
from the patients operated between 2010 and 2013. We analyzed the records of
242 patients divided into two groups: Group I: 149 patients undergoing
cardiopulmonary bypass and Group II - 93 patients undergoing the miniature
cardiopulmonary bypass.ResultsThe clinical profile of patients in the preoperative period was similar in
the cardiopulmonary bypass and miniature cardiopulmonary bypass groups
without significant differences, except in age, which was greater in the
miniature cardiopulmonary bypass group. The perioperative data were
significant of blood collected for autotransfusion, which were higher in the
group with miniature cardiopulmonary bypass than the cardiopulmonary bypass
and in transfusion of packed red blood cells, which was higher in
cardiopulmonary bypass than in miniature cardiopulmonary bypass. In the
immediate, first and second postoperative period the values of hematocrit
and hemoglobin were higher and significant in miniature cardiopulmonary
bypass than in the cardiopulmonary bypass, although the bleeding in the
first and second postoperative days was higher and significant in miniature
cardiopulmonary bypass than in the cardiopulmonary bypass.ConclusionThe present results suggest that the miniature cardiopulmonary bypass was
beneficial in reducing the red blood cell transfusion during surgery and
showed slight but significant increase in hematocrit and hemoglobin in the
postoperative period.
Third International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine for Latin America plays a critical role in the inflammatory response and, potentially, a polymorphism in IRAK1 may alter the immune response impacting clinical outcome. P2 Gene expression and intracellular NF-κ κB activation after HMGB1 and LPS stimuli in neutrophils from septic patients
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.