Background:Where cancer patients receive surgical care has implications on policy and planning and on patients' satisfaction and outcomes. We conducted a population-based analysis of where rectal cancer patients undergo surgery and a qualitative analysis of rectal cancer patients' perspectives on location of surgical care. Methods:We reviewed Manitoba Cancer Registry data on patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed between 2004 and 2006. We interviewed rural patients with rectal cancer regarding their preferences and the factors they considered when deciding on treatment location. Interview data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. (colon: 1578, rectal: 508). Among rural patients (n = 907), those with rectal cancer were more likely to undergo surgery at an urban centre than those with colon cancer (46.5% v. 28.8%, p < 0.001). Twenty rural patients with rectal cancer participated in interviews. We identified 3 major themes from the interview data: the decisionmaker, treatment factors and personal factors. Participants described varying input into referral decisions, and often they did not perceive a choice regarding treatment location. Treatment factors, including surgeon factors and hospital factors, were important when considering treatment location. Personal factors, including travel, support, accommodation, finances and employment, also affected participants' treatment experiences. Results: From 2004 to 2006, 2086 patients received diagnoses of CRC in Manitoba Conclusion:A substantial proportion of rural patients with rectal cancer undergo surgery at urban centres. The reasons are complex and only partly related to patient choice. Further studies are required to better understand cancer system access in geographically dispersed populations and to support cancer patients through the decision-making and treatment processes.

Bariatric patients are difficult to assess clinically for signs of postoperative complication. Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) is used to investigate patients suspicious for complications such as anastomotic leak (AL) and intra-abdominal hemorrhage (IH). Most bariatric surgeons use DL in the presence of sustained tachycardia; however, the rate of this procedure and its clinical value have not been sufficiently investigated.A retrospective review of patients undergoing bariatric surgery from January 2010 to December 2011 was performed. Data from 4 collaborative bariatric centres of excellence were included in this analysis. From among all elective bariatric procedures, cases that required early reoperation were selected for further evaluation.A total of 1001 elective bariatric procedures were identified. Of these, 952 (95%) were primary bariatric procedures, including 866 (91%) Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses and 86 (9%) sleeve gastrectomies. The remaining 48 cases represented revisional proced ures. Of these, 11 patients (1.1%) returned to the operating room within 72 hours for DL: 64% were primary cases (n = 7) and 36% revisional cases (n = 4). Intraoperative findings included AL (45%, n = 5), IH (27%, n = 3), no pathology identified (18%, n = 2) and small bowel obstruction (9%, n = 1). Of the 9 patients with complications, all were tachycardic (heart rate > 100 beats/min), and 4 of the 5 patients with AL were febrile (t > 37.5). There were no reported adverse events directly related to the use of DL.Diagnostic laparoscopy is a useful and safe option for both the diagnosis and treatment of suspected complications after bariatric surgery. The majority of patients returning to operating room had significant findings, and all were treated laparoscopically. Persistent postoperative tachycardia or fever were highly predictive of positive findings during DL. An emphasis on early decisionmaking and expeditious return to the operating room for laparoscopy should be the standard for bariatric patients on clinical suspicion of a postoperative complication. 4Changes of active and total ghrelin, GLP-1 and PYY following restrictive bariatric surgery and their impact on satiety: comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. A