Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used as a monitoring tool for disease activity in therapeutic trials in multiple sclerosis. There is, however, only a limited relationship between MRI findings and clinical outcome measurements. It has been suggested that hypointense lesion load on T1 weighted imaging has a better correlation with disability than the more conventional T2 hyper intense lesion load. This study was undertaken to (i) evaluate different measurement techniques used to quantify T1 hypointense lesion load, and (ii) to compare lesion load as measured using different parameters and disability. Twenty-five patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, mean age of 40 years (23-57), mean EDSS 5.7 (4-7) were analysed. T2 lesion load on FSE correlated well with both the hypointense lesion load on T1 pre-gadolinium (r = 0.8, P < 0.0001) and T1 post-gadolinium (r = 0.8, P < 0.0001) but less so with the enhancing lesion load (r = 0.4, P < 0.05). There was a very strong correlation with T1 hypo-intense lesion volume pre and post gadolinium (r = 0.96, P < 0.001). However, the EDSS was not correlated with the T2 lesion load (r = -0.27, P = 0.2), T1 pre-gadolinium load (r = -0.3, P = 0.1), T1 post gadolinium load (r = -0.4, P = 0.7) and enhancing lesion load (r = -0.28, P = 0.2), or with the degree of hypointensity of T1 weighted images determined using the threshold technique. There is a strong correlation between T1 hypointense lesion volume both pre and post gadolinium and also between T1 and T2 lesion volumes.

Introduction:Prostate positional variability has been widely explored with seminal vesicle (SV) variability, coming into the forefront only in recent years. While planning target volume (PTV) margins and preparation protocols ameliorate the effects of bladder and rectum volume changes on prostate, studies on SV variation have looked at only position, not volume variability.Aim:The aim of this study was to investigate whether the inter-fraction volume variability of the VSs can exist in patients receiving radiotherapy to the prostate.Method:SV variability was investigated by comparing four on-treatment cone beam computer tomography scans to a planning computer tomography (CT) image for two patients receiving prostate radiotherapy. For each case, variation in volumes (cm3) was compared with intra-observer variation.Results:SV volume variability was seen in both patients, with the largest change in volume being 78·38%. This variance was considerably (between 2 and 10 times) larger than the measured intra-observer variance.Conclusion:This study identified the potential for daily SV volume variability in patients receiving prostate radiotherapy. Future large-scale studies are warranted to identify the extent of this motion and potential clinical impact. Evidence-informed PTV margins and possible SV volume control protocols may need to be adopted.

Non-medical prescribing is not a new initiative in healthcare. The modernisation of the NHS, strained workforces in radiotherapy and clinical oncology and the recognition that the role of the radiographer extends across the entire patient pathway has motivated development of therapeutic radiographer roles. For advanced, expert and consultant radiographers, this includes non–medical, supplementary, and independent prescribing authority. Limitations in current prescribing legislation have the potential to negatively impact these services. However, the overall benefits of non-medical prescribing for the patient, professional and entire workforce are undeniable. Radiographer non-medical prescribing is pertinent to the maintenance and continued improvement of cancer services.