Continuing with the evaluation of costabilizers along with preheated metal stearates to stabilize poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), pentaerythritol was chosen as a longterm costabilizer. During normal stabilization conditions, the polyol enhances the induction time to degradation but produces large amounts of polyenes. The use of the preheated mixture of metal soaps and preheated ZnSt 2 enhanced even more such times, while preheated CaSt 2 reduced them. The same effect was seen with the b-diketone; and, as in that case, the results seems to be the sum of both separated effects. Evaluations of induction times to degradation, carbonyl formation, visible reflectance, and UV-visible and fluorescence spectroscopic techniques support these findings.

No abstract

The effects of a range of thermal and light stabilizers on the melt stability (investigated via multiple pass extrusion) and color stability of three different polyethylenes (PEs) were examined. The PEs varied in terms of the catalyst system used to synthesize the polymers and included an HDPE produced by using a chromium‐based Phillips catalyst and two LLDPEs produced via chromium‐based metallocene and titanium‐based Ziegler‐Natta catalysts. The additive types included a range of phenolics of different functionality, phosphites, hindered piperidines, an hydroxylamine, and Vitamin E. The results obtained for the three PEs confirmed that primary antioxidants (AOs) such as highly hindered and less, hindered phenols or hydroxylamines promoted good melt stability but in some cases tended toward yellowing. The secondary AOs such as the phosphites or thioethers behaved in the opposite way; color suppression was good, but melt stabilization was poor. It was also shown that for different types of phenols (all with similar molar activity), reducing steric hindrance to the phenolic OH enhanced the tendency to form chromophoric groups and hence color led to better efficiency than high hindrance. Those phenol with higher molar activity (mol OH/kg AO) showed the best processing performance. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers

a b s t r a c tSeveral polyethylene resins; high density polyethylene (Ph-HDPE, Phillips metal oxide catalyst) and linear low density polyethytlenes (LLDPE, formed using ZieglereNatta catalyst and metallocene catalyst technology, m-LLDPE) were used in order to acquire an insight in to the effect of different polymerization catalyst systems on the melt stabilization performance of single AO. Chemiluminescence (CL) and melt flow rate (MFR) were used to analyze the degradation as a function of the number of passes through a twin-screw extruder. A good correlation was obtained, and the additives resulting with the best melt flow stability in the polymer were the same as those that promote the best CL results.

This article considers the interaction between additives that occur during the stabilization process. The simultaneous effects of the additives and associated interactions on melt processing stability and processing discoloration were of particular interest. Melt stability is an important factor to consider because physical changes in the processed polymer can occur during the compounding and fabrication steps. Furthermore, discoloration is one of the most important problems affecting commercial polymers. Most discoloration manifests itself as yellowing, especially in the case of polyolefins. Although yellowing can often be associated with degradation processes caused by various agents, such as light or heat, this is not always the case; yellowing can also be due to the interaction of additives in the stabilizer packages. Blends of primary antioxidants (AOs), secondary AOs, and hindered amine light stabilizers have been studied with the intention of further improving stabilization performance together with cost reduction of the stabilized polymer. Although synergism between AOs and a stabilizer is fairly common, antagonism was also observed in terms of melt flow protection and in color stability in some of the AOs tested. The effects of a range of thermal and light stabilizers on the melt stability (investigated via multiple pass extrusion) and color stability of three different polyethylenes (PEs) were examined. The PEs varied in terms of the catalyst system used to synthesize the polymers and included a high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) produced by using a chromium‐based Phillips catalyst and two linear low‐density polyethylenes (LLDPEs) produced via chromium‐based metallocene and titanium‐based Ziegler‐Natta catalysts. The apparent lack of influence of polymerization catalyst system on the mode of stabilizer interaction should lead to the reassessment of stabilizer formulation strategies in relation to PE type/catalyst system and associated commercial/economic considerations. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 22:117–127, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers